Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 24;19(1):873.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05393-5.

Rotational osteotomy of forearm bones for treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis in children

Affiliations

Rotational osteotomy of forearm bones for treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis in children

Xiaolin Luo et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: Congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS) is a rare upper limb deformity characterized by impaired rotational movement of the forearm. Rotational osteotomy is a commonly employed surgical procedure for treatment. This study aimed to analyze its surgical efficacy in treating CRUS in children.

Methods: 22 children (24 limbs) with CRUS from January 2010 to December 2023 were retrospectively collected. Rotational osteotomy of proximal ulna and distal radius was performed. Forearm function was evaluated using Failla scores and hygiene and self-care scores in Activities of daily Living score (ADL score). In addition, patients were further grouped and compared according to type of ulnar internal fixation and age at surgery.

Results: 22 patients (14 males, 8 females), with an average age of 6.0 years and an average follow-up time of 56 months. The mean pronation angle before surgery was 75.0 ± 11.3°, the mean postoperative pronation angle was 3.8 ± 7.1°, and the mean correction degree was 78.8 ± 12.9°. The average Failla scores were 5.6 ± 2.1 points before operation and 14.0 ± 1.0 points after operation. The average scores of hygiene and self-care scores were 19.0 ± 5.1 points before surgery and 36.0 ± 3.9 points after surgery. No child developed complications such as osteofascial compartment syndrome or infection. The correction angle in the plate fixation group was 86.8 ± 10.6°, while in the K-wires group was 72.0 ± 10.7°. The postoperative Failla scores in the older age group were 13.0 ± 1.1 points, and in the younger age group were 14.3 ± 0.8 points.

Conclusion: Rotational osteotomy of forearm bones is safe and effective in the treatment of CRUS in children. Ulnar plate fixation has better correction than K-wires. Furthermore, younger children have better surgical outcomes than older ones.

Keywords: Children; Congenital radioulnar synostosis; Rotational osteotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University approved this study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Typical case 1, male, bilateral CRUS, age at surgery 4 years. A-B: preoperative left forearm anteroposterior and lateral x-rays, C: preoperative elbow-flexed neutral appearance, D: preoperative left-handed bowl holding, E–F: 1 day postoperative left forearm anteroposterior and lateral x-rays, G-H: 3.5 years postoperative left forearm anteroposterior and lateral x-rays. I-N: 3.5 years postoperative follow-up appearance photographs. The forearm can perform pronation and supination movements with compensation at the shoulder and wrist joints
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Typical case 2. male, left CRUS, age at surgery 6 years old. A-B: Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of the left forearm, C-D: Preoperative gross examination. E–F: Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of the left forearm on the first day, G-H: Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of the left forearm at 4 months. I-N: Follow-up photographs of the appearance at 4 months postoperatively. The forearm can perform pronation and supination movements with compensation at the shoulder and wrist joints

Similar articles

References

    1. Fujimoto M, Kato H, Minami A. Rotational osteotomy at the diaphysis of the radius in the treatment of congenital radioulnar synostosis[J]. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25(5):676–9. - PubMed
    1. Hong P, Tan W, Zhou WZ, et al. The relation between radiographic manifestation and clinical characteristics of congenital radioulnar synostosis in children: a retrospective study from multiple centers[J]. Front Pediatr. 2023. 10.3389/fped.2023.1117060. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rutkowski PT, Samora JB. Congenital radioulnar synostosis[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(13):563–70. - PubMed
    1. Kepenek-Varol B, Hosbay Z. Is short-term hand therapy effective in a child with congenital radioulnar synostosis? A case report[J]. J Hand Ther. 2020;33(3):435–42. - PubMed
    1. Bo H, Xu J, Lin J, et al. Outcomes of two-stage double-level rotational osteotomy in treating patients with congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis[J]. World J Pediatr Surg. 2023;6(2): e000578. - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources