Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr;20(4):385-400.
doi: 10.1177/17474930241312649. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

Ischemic stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent ischemic stroke, TIA, or intracranial hemorrhage: A World Stroke Organization (WSO) scientific statement

Affiliations
Review

Ischemic stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and a recent ischemic stroke, TIA, or intracranial hemorrhage: A World Stroke Organization (WSO) scientific statement

Luciano A Sposato et al. Int J Stroke. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Secondary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the fastest growing areas in the field of cerebrovascular diseases. This scientific statement from the World Stroke Organization Brain & Heart Task Force provides a critical analysis of the strength of current evidence on this topic, highlights areas of current controversy, identifies knowledge gaps, and proposes priorities for future research.

Methods: We select topics with the highest clinical relevance and perform a systematic search to answer specific practical questions. Based on the strength of available evidence and knowledge gaps, we identify topics that need to be prioritized in future research. For this purpose, we adopt a novel classification of evidence strength based on the availability of publications in which the primary population is patients with recent (<6 months) cerebrovascular events, the primary study endpoint is a recurrent ischemic stroke, and the quality of the studies (e.g. observational versus randomized controlled trial).

Summary: Priority areas include AF screening, molecular biomarkers, AF subtype classification, anticoagulation in device-detected AF, timing of anticoagulation initiation, effective management of breakthrough strokes on existing anticoagulant therapy, the role of left atrial appendage closure, novel approaches, and antithrombotic therapy post-intracranial hemorrhage. Strength of currently available evidence varies across the selected topics, with early anticoagulation being the one showing more consistent data.

Conclusion: Several knowledge gaps persist in most areas related to secondary stroke prevention in AF. Prioritizing research in this field is crucial to advance current knowledge and improve clinical care.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; anticoagulants; detection; prevention; recommendation; stroke; transient ischemic attack.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: LAS: Speaker/consulting honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Medtronic; ACC: Speaker honoraria from BMS, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Boehringer Ingelheim; MK: Speaker/Consulting honoraria from Astra Zeneca, BMS, Medtronic; NBS: Consulting honoraria from Medtronic; VC: Speaker/consulting honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Bayer, EVER PHARMA, Daiichi Sankyo; C-YH: Speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Bayer, Medtronic; MJH: Speaker honoraria from Sanofi; DJS: Speaker/consulting honoraria from Pfizer and AstraZeneca; MCB: Speaker/consulting honoraria from J&J, Anthos Therapeutics, Merck; JFS: Speaker honoraria from BMS, Pfizer, AstraZeneca; AS: Speaker/consulting honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Daiichi Sankyo Ltd, Javelin Inc; other authors: no disclosures relevant to this work.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Classification of levels of evidence. RCT: randomized controlled trial; IS/TIA/ICH: ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack or intracranial hemorrhage.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
AF risk based on the timing of detection and intensity of cardiac monitoring. AF: atrial fibrillation; ECG: 12-lead electrocardiogram; AFDAS: atrial fibrillation detected after stroke.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Etiological investigation of breakthrough strokes. OAC: oral anticoagulant; AF: atrial fibrillation; LAA: left atrial appendage.

Similar articles

References

    1. Li X, Liu Z, Jiang X, et al.. Global, regional, and national burdens of atrial fibrillation/flutter from1990 to 2019: an age-period-cohort analysis using the global burden of disease 2019 study. J Glob Health 2023; 13: 4154. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F, Cervellin G. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: an increasing epidemic and public health challenge. Int J Stroke 2021; 16: 217–221. - PubMed
    1. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke 1991; 22: 983–988. - PubMed
    1. Jewett GA, Lindsay MP, Goia C, et al.. National trends in hospital admission, case fatality, and sex differences in atrial fibrillation-related strokes. Int J Stroke 2020; 15: 521–527. - PubMed
    1. Sur NB, Wang K, Di Tullio MR, et al.. Disparities and temporal trends in the use of anticoagulation in patients with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation. Stroke 2019; 50: 1452–1459. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources