Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Acuity 360 Telemedicine Vision Screening System
- PMID: 39720187
- PMCID: PMC11668333
- DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S476868
Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Acuity 360 Telemedicine Vision Screening System
Abstract
Purpose: Our aim is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Acuity 360 telemedicine system, as compared to in-person clinic examination, in identifying clinically significant eye disease. Acuity 360 is a combination of commercially available ocular imaging devices used together to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the structures and diseases of the eye.
Methods: Observational cross-sectional study of consecutively examined patients where 19 remote examiners analyzed 80 patients using Acuity 360 images. The examiners' diagnoses were compared to the diagnosis obtained from in-person clinic examination of all the patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), false-negative rate, and inter-rater agreement were calculated.
Results: Compared to in-person clinic examination, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and false-negative rate for the optical coherence tomography (OCT) of optic nerve were 95.8%, 98.5%, 86.8%, 99.6%, 0.39% and for the combined retina examination (OCT of the macula and widefield fundus photography) were 93.4%, 88.5%, 80.2%, 96.4%, 2.19%, respectively. The median inter-rater agreement the OCT of optic nerve and the combined retina examination were each 95%.
Conclusion: The Acuity 360 telemedicine system has a low false-negative rate and is highly sensitive and specific when compared to an in-person clinic examination. It can determine the necessity for specialist referral and triage the patients that require urgent treatment. High inter-rater agreement shows that it is effective with minimal variability in analyzing the Acuity 360 images by remote examiners.
Keywords: optical coherence tomography; sensitivity; specificity; tele-ophthalmology; telemedicine.
© 2024 Binder et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The Authors all declare that there is no conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Implementation of Teleretinal Screening Using Optical Coherence Tomography in the Veterans Health Administration.Telemed J E Health. 2021 Aug;27(8):898-904. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0118. Epub 2021 Jul 12. Telemed J E Health. 2021. PMID: 34297906
-
Evaluation of a Remote Diagnosis Imaging Model vs Dilated Eye Examination in Referable Macular Degeneration.JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):802-808. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.1203. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31095245 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Utility of Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometry and Fundus Photographs Compared to Spectral Domain OCT in Center-Involving Diabetic Macular Edema.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;32(1):95-102. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2024.2338824. Epub 2024 May 6. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2025. PMID: 38709173
-
[New examination methods for macular disorders--application of diagnosis and treatment].Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2000 Dec;104(12):899-942. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2000. PMID: 11193944 Review. Japanese.
-
Feedback on ophthalmologic telemedicine in a nursing home.J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 Nov;43(9):e293-e297. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Sep 22. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020. PMID: 32977979 Review.
References
-
- Chandrasekaran S, Kass W, Thangamathesvaran L, et al. Tele-glaucoma vs clinical evaluation: the New Jersey Health Foundation Prospective Clinical Study. J Telemed Telecare. 2019:1357633X19845273. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources