Trustworthy AI: responses to commentators
- PMID: 39720403
- PMCID: PMC11663812
- DOI: 10.1007/s44204-024-00229-9
Trustworthy AI: responses to commentators
Abstract
In 'Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence', we develop a novel account of how it is that AI can be trustworthy and what it takes for an AI to be trustworthy. In this paper, we respond to a suite of recent comments on this account, due to J. Adam Carter, Dong-yong Choi, Rune Nyrup, and Fei Song. We would like to thank all four for their thoughtful engagement with our work, as well as the Asian Journal of Philosophy for publishing the symposium on our paper. The game plan for the paper is as follows. We will first briefly rehearse the account and then respond to comments in turn.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Obligations; Responsibility; Trust; Trustworthiness.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics,96(2), 231–260.
-
- Choi, D.-Y. (2023). The trustworthiness of AI: Comments on Simion and Kelp’s account. Asian Journal of Philosophy,2(1), 1–9.
-
- Cohen, S. (2013). Forced Supererogation. European Journal of Philosophy,23(4), 1006–1024.
-
- Crisp, Roger (2013). Supererogation and virtue. In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics (vol. 3), M. Timmons (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources