Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 10:15:1488328.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1488328. eCollection 2024.

CARE Model of Treatment for stuttering: Theory, assumptions, and preliminary findings

Courtney T Byrd  1 , Geoffrey A Coalson  1 , Edward G Conture  1
Affiliations

CARE Model of Treatment for stuttering: Theory, assumptions, and preliminary findings

Courtney T Byrd et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present a theory of therapy for stuttering, its related assumptions, and findings from associated empirical studies. Specifically, we propose the Blank Center CARE™ Model of Treatment (CT) for stuttering, which differs from the current, widely employed fluency model of treatment (FT). The CT reflects the authors' belief in the need to move away from fluency-focused or seemingly ableist treatments (i.e., any approach that attempts to correct, cure, or fix a disabling condition) for stuttering. The authors propose a shift toward a theory of treatment that addresses whole-person wellness and considers the treatment of stuttering from outside the framework of fluency shaping and stuttering modification. In support of such considerations, this article provides preliminary findings from both non-clinical and clinical studies of using the CT for children and adults. Although preliminary, these findings appear to lend empirical support to the authors' belief that the treatment of stuttering needs to change. In essence, a change in the zeitgeist regarding the treatment of stuttering may contribute to an associated paradigm shift from FT to CT in the management of stuttering in children and adults.

Keywords: adults; children; non-ableist; stammering; stuttering; theory; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Some essential differences between fluency treatment (FT) and communication treatment (CT) strategies for stuttering treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The CT model attempts to protect (young children) and reject/minimize (older children, adults) from the expectation of fluency. The CT assumes that protecting as well as minimizing an expectancy of fluency appreciably contributes to improvement in QOL.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abou-Dahech T., Gabel R. (2020). Vocational stereotyping of people who stutter: human resource management students. Perspect. ASHA Spec. Interest Groups 5, 1139–1146. doi: 10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00003 - DOI
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th Edn. American Psychiatric Publishing.
    1. American Psychological Association (2022). APA Task Force on Guidelines for Assessment and Intervention with Persons with Disabilities. Guidelines for assessment and intervention with persons with disabilities. Available online at: https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-assessment-intervention-disa... [Accessed March 26, 2024]
    1. Anderson M. R., Stuart A. (2017). Speech-language pathologists’ perception of persons who stutter before and after therapy. Int. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. Aud. 5, 5–14. doi: 10.12970/2311-1917.2017.05.02 - DOI
    1. Andresen v. Fuddruckers, Inc. (2004). Civil No. 03-3294 (DWF/SRN). Available online at: https://casetext.com/case/andresen-v-fuddruckers? (Accessed December 14, 2004).

LinkOut - more resources