CARE Model of Treatment for stuttering: Theory, assumptions, and preliminary findings
- PMID: 39720681
- PMCID: PMC11667897
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1488328
CARE Model of Treatment for stuttering: Theory, assumptions, and preliminary findings
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present a theory of therapy for stuttering, its related assumptions, and findings from associated empirical studies. Specifically, we propose the Blank Center CARE™ Model of Treatment (CT) for stuttering, which differs from the current, widely employed fluency model of treatment (FT). The CT reflects the authors' belief in the need to move away from fluency-focused or seemingly ableist treatments (i.e., any approach that attempts to correct, cure, or fix a disabling condition) for stuttering. The authors propose a shift toward a theory of treatment that addresses whole-person wellness and considers the treatment of stuttering from outside the framework of fluency shaping and stuttering modification. In support of such considerations, this article provides preliminary findings from both non-clinical and clinical studies of using the CT for children and adults. Although preliminary, these findings appear to lend empirical support to the authors' belief that the treatment of stuttering needs to change. In essence, a change in the zeitgeist regarding the treatment of stuttering may contribute to an associated paradigm shift from FT to CT in the management of stuttering in children and adults.
Keywords: adults; children; non-ableist; stammering; stuttering; theory; treatment.
Copyright © 2024 Byrd, Coalson and Conture.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Social validation of post-treatment outcomes of adults who stutter who participated in CARE Model treatment: replication and extension.Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 May 21;6:1541059. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1541059. eCollection 2025. Front Rehabil Sci. 2025. PMID: 40469927 Free PMC article.
-
A theory building critical realist evaluation of an integrated cognitive-behavioural fluency enhancing stuttering treatment for school-age children. Part 1: Development of a preliminary program theory from expert speech-language pathologist data.J Fluency Disord. 2024 Dec;82:106076. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2024.106076. Epub 2024 Aug 24. J Fluency Disord. 2024. PMID: 39216178
-
Stages of change and stuttering: a preliminary view.J Fluency Disord. 2007;32(2):95-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2007.03.001. Epub 2007 Mar 14. J Fluency Disord. 2007. PMID: 17499124
-
Stuttering treatment for adults: an update on contemporary approaches.Semin Speech Lang. 2010 Nov;31(4):272-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265760. Epub 2010 Nov 15. Semin Speech Lang. 2010. PMID: 21080299 Review.
-
Evidence-based treatment and stuttering--historical perspective.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb;52(1):254-63. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0111). Epub 2008 Aug 11. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009. PMID: 18695017 Review.
Cited by
-
Reimagining stuttering therapy and outcomes through an acceptance and collaborative lens.J Fluency Disord. 2025 Mar;83:106105. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2025.106105. Epub 2025 Jan 31. J Fluency Disord. 2025. PMID: 39893974 Free PMC article.
-
Working memory capacity and rumination in adults who stutter.J Fluency Disord. 2025 Jun;84:106119. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2025.106119. Epub 2025 Apr 24. J Fluency Disord. 2025. PMID: 40334435
-
An active inference account of stuttering behavior.Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Apr 3;19:1498423. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1498423. eCollection 2025. Front Hum Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40247916 Free PMC article.
-
Social validation of post-treatment outcomes of adults who stutter who participated in CARE Model treatment: replication and extension.Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 May 21;6:1541059. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1541059. eCollection 2025. Front Rehabil Sci. 2025. PMID: 40469927 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abou-Dahech T., Gabel R. (2020). Vocational stereotyping of people who stutter: human resource management students. Perspect. ASHA Spec. Interest Groups 5, 1139–1146. doi: 10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00003 - DOI
-
- American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th Edn. American Psychiatric Publishing.
-
- American Psychological Association (2022). APA Task Force on Guidelines for Assessment and Intervention with Persons with Disabilities. Guidelines for assessment and intervention with persons with disabilities. Available online at: https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-assessment-intervention-disa... [Accessed March 26, 2024]
-
- Anderson M. R., Stuart A. (2017). Speech-language pathologists’ perception of persons who stutter before and after therapy. Int. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. Aud. 5, 5–14. doi: 10.12970/2311-1917.2017.05.02 - DOI
-
- Andresen v. Fuddruckers, Inc. (2004). Civil No. 03-3294 (DWF/SRN). Available online at: https://casetext.com/case/andresen-v-fuddruckers? (Accessed December 14, 2004).
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources