Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 39720853
- PMCID: PMC11669080
- DOI: 10.1111/liv.16222
Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background & aims: Approximately 40% of patients with Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) show incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid, thus needing second-line treatment to prevent disease progression. As no head-to-head comparison study is available, we used a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare efficacy and safety of available second-line therapies.
Methods: We performed a systematic literature review including randomised, placebo-controlled trials of patients with PBC and incomplete response, or intolerance, to ursodeoxycholic acid, and compared relative risks (RRs) for primary (biochemical response at 52-week) and secondary outcomes [incidence of new-onset pruritus and serious adverse events (SAEs)].
Results: The NMA included three studies, each testing obeticholic acid (OCA), seladelpar or elafibranor versus placebo (active therapy/placebo: 379/191 patients). All treatments significantly increased the RR for biochemical response with an advantage of elafibranor versus seladelpar (RR: 4.37, 95% CI: 1.01-18.87). OCA 5-10 mg/10 mg was associated with a higher risk of new-onset pruritus compared to placebo (RR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-1.88/RR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.37-2.33), while seladelpar decreased this risk (RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12-0.80). Compared to placebo, OCA 5-10 mg/10 mg was associated with an increased risk of SAE (RR: 3.82; 95% CI: 1.46-10.02/RR 2.67; 95% CI: 1.00-7.08).
Conclusions: Among second line therapies for patients with PBC, elafibranor is slightly more effective in obtaining biochemical response than seladelpar that, on the other hand, is the only drug associated with a lower incidence of pruritus. While of similar efficacy, OCA was associated with increased pruritus and SAEs. These findings may help personalise second-line treatment in patients with PBC.
Keywords: bezafibrate; elafibranor; obeticholic acid; response; seladelpar; treatment; ursodeoxycholic acid.
© 2024 The Author(s). Liver International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Edoardo G. Giannini reports speaking and teaching for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Gilead, Roche; advising for AstraZeneca, Eisai, Gilead, Ipsen, Roche. Sara Labanca speaking and teaching for Advanz, Gilead, Ipsen. Simona Marenco speaking and teaching for Ipsen. Mario Strazzabosco advises for Engitix. Andrea Pasta, Francesco Calabrese, Giulia Pieri and Maria Corina Plaz Torres have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Colapietro F., Bertazzoni A., and Lleo A., “Contemporary Epidemiology of Primary Biliary Cholangitis,” Clinics in Liver Disease 26, no. 4 (2022): 555–570. - PubMed
-
- Gerussi A., Cristoferi L., Carbone M., Asselta R., and Invernizzi P., “The Immunobiology of Female Predominance in Primary Biliary Cholangitis,” Journal of Autoimmunity 95 (2018): 124–132. - PubMed
-
- Corpechot C., Abenavoli L., Rabahi N., et al., “Biochemical Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid and Long‐Term Prognosis in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis,” Hepatology 48, no. 3 (2008): 871–877. - PubMed
-
- Corpechot C., Carrat F., Bonnand A. M., Poupon R. E., and Poupon R., “The Effect of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Therapy on Liver Fibrosis Progression in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis,” Hepatology 32, no. 6 (2000): 1196–1199. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
