Histopathological Examination of 404 Sleeve Gastrectomy Specimens at a Large UK Center and Systematic Review of the Published Literature
- PMID: 39720968
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07641-3
Histopathological Examination of 404 Sleeve Gastrectomy Specimens at a Large UK Center and Systematic Review of the Published Literature
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) specimens are histologically analyzed to identify incidental pathologies. However, no guidelines recommend routine histology. This study evaluates the clinical utility of LSG sample analysis and if incidental diagnoses have a significant clinical impact.
Methods: A single high-volume UK bariatric unit retrospectively gathered LSG data covering a 9-year period. All specimens were sent for histological analysis. Where incidental diagnoses were identified, patient records were reviewed to assess any clinical management alterations. A systematic review (2013-2023) was performed, exploring rates of incidental pathologies post-LSG. Publications were stratified into those performing routine pre-operative endoscopy, or not, and results compared to present data.
Results: From 01/06/2013 to 12/12/2022, 404 patients underwent LSG. 365/404 (90.4%) had no pathology on histopathological analysis. Seven (1.7%) appeared macroscopically abnormal, with histology identifying 3 polyposis and 1 each of GIST, pernicious anaemia, sarcoidosis and gastritis. Ten (2.48%) appeared macroscopically normal but had incidental pathology. All patient management remained unchanged. Twenty-two (5.44%) were H. pylori positive. Forty-eight publications within wider literature reviewed LSG specimen histology. Fifteen, including 9662 patients undergoing pre-operative endoscopy, found pathological diagnoses in 0.5% and 1 malignancy. Thirty-three studies reporting 17,008 patients without pre-operative endoscopy identified pathologies in 0.45% and 7 malignancies.
Conclusion: There is little clinical utility in analyzing macroscopically normal gastric samples following LSG. The potential financial and environmental savings from limiting this practice are of great importance to worldwide bariatric teams. The authors recommend selectively sending LSG specimens only if abnormal gastric mucosa is identified when examining the extracted specimen.
Keywords: Endoscopy; Histopathology; Incidental diagnosis; Sleeve gastrectomy.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Human Ethics and Consent to Participate: This is a retrospective observational review of a prospectively maintained anonymized database. Therefore, additional ethical approval was not required for the production of this manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Histopathological Changes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Specimens: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Value of Routine Histopathologic Examination.Obes Surg. 2017 Jul;27(7):1741-1749. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2525-1. Obes Surg. 2017. PMID: 28063114 Free PMC article.
-
Compared to What? Is BMI Associated with Histopathological Changes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Specimens?Obes Surg. 2019 Jul;29(7):2166-2173. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03801-y. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 30989568
-
Is histopathological examination of sleeve gastrectomy specimens necessary in areas endemic for gastric cancer?Natl Med J India. 2019 Mar-Apr;32(2):83-85. doi: 10.4103/0970-258X.275346. Natl Med J India. 2019. PMID: 31939402
-
Review of pathological findings in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy specimens performed for morbid obesity.J Clin Pathol. 2020 Oct;73(10):618-623. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206428. Epub 2020 Jun 26. J Clin Pathol. 2020. PMID: 32591353 Review.
-
Is Portomesenteric Vein Thrombosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Related to Short-Course Prophylaxis of Thromboembolism? A Monocentric Retrospective Analysis About an Infrequent but Not Rare Complication and Review of the Literature.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Oct;27(10):987-996. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0190. Epub 2017 Jun 12. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017. PMID: 28604246 Review.
Cited by
-
Commentary on "Histopathological Examination of 404 Sleeve Gastrectomy Specimens at a Large UK Center and Systematic Review of the Published Literature".Obes Surg. 2025 Jul;35(7):2765-2766. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07936-z. Epub 2025 Jun 3. Obes Surg. 2025. PMID: 40459720 No abstract available.
References
-
- Musella M, Berardi G, Velotti N, et al. Ten-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: retrospective matched comparison with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding-is there a significant difference in long term? Obes Surg. 2021;31(12):5267–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05735-w . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Nowak K, et al. Histologic and cost-benefit analysis of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy specimens performed for morbid obesity. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021;145(3):365–70. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2020-0084-OA . - DOI - PubMed
-
- McAlister S, Barratt AL, Bell KJ, et al. The carbon footprint of pathology testing. Med J Aust. 2020;212(8):377–82. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50583 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Campos GM, et al. ASMBS position statement on the rationale for performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021;17(5):837–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2021.03.007 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical