Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 11:6:1509784.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1509784. eCollection 2024.

Meeting international self-report muscle strengthening guidelines is associated with better cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in adults

Affiliations

Meeting international self-report muscle strengthening guidelines is associated with better cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in adults

Jocelyn Waghorn et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Engaging in muscle strengthening activities (e.g., resistance training) at least twice/week is promoted by (Inter)national movement guidelines. Cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (cvBRS) reflects the ability to modulate R-R interval in response to changes in systolic blood pressure. Given the current conflicting literature, this study posed to explore the relationship between self-report muscle strengthening frequency and spontaneous cvBRS. 114 adults (62 females; age: 33 ± 19 years, 22% >55 years; body mass index: 24.2 ± 3.7 kg/m2) self-reported their weekly muscle strengthening activity frequencies via the Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire. Supine beat-by-beat R-R intervals [electrocardiography; 1.00 ± 0.18 s (0.90-1.50 s)] and systolic blood pressure [via finger photoplethysmography; 116 ± 11 mmHg (93-151 mmHg)] were recorded for 10.7 ± 2.0 min (5.3-14.5 min). Spontaneous cvBRS was assessed using the sequence technique. Data were analyzed using multiple regressions adjusted for age, sex, body mass index. Participants completed 2 ± 2 (0-7) days/week of muscle strengthening activities (56% met guidelines), and average overall cvBRS was 14.9 ± 9.1 (3.1-48.4) ms/mmHg. Higher reported frequencies were positively associated with overall cvBRS (Adjusted R2 = 0.40, p < 0.001; β = 2.24, p < 0.001). Meeting muscle strengthening activity guidelines was associated with improved overall cvBRS (Adjusted R2 = 0.29, p < 0.001; β = 7.68, p < 0.001). All results were unchanged if cvBRS for up-sequences or down-sequences only were used (all, p < 0.001). In conclusion, engaging in muscle strengthening exercises and particularly meeting existing guidelines were associated with better beat-by-beat vagally-mediated blood pressure regulation.

Keywords: autonomic function; blood pressure regulation; cardiovagal baroreceptor sensitivity; physical activity guidelines; resistance training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multiple regression of muscle strengthening frequency and spontaneously measured cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity. Participants (n = 114, 62 females) are grouped by age and sex, with triangles representing males, circles representing females, grey representing those 55 years or younger, and white representing those over 55 years. The multiple regression included moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, age, sex, and body mass index as covariates.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparing the spontaneously measured cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity of those who met muscle strengthening guidelines to those who did not. Participants (n = 114, 62 females) are grouped by sex and age with triangles representing males, circles representing females, grey representing those 55 years or younger, and white representing those over 55 years. Mean and standard deviation of each group, those that did not meet guidelines and those that did are represented by the large black circles. The multiple regression included moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, age, sex, and body mass index as covariates.

Similar articles

References

    1. Schoenfeld BJ, Ogborn D, Krieger JW. Effects of resistance training frequency on measures of muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. (2016) 46(11):1689–97. 10.1007/s40279-016-0543-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lopez P, Taaffe DR, Galvão DA, Newton RU, Nonemacher ER, Wendt VM, et al. Resistance training effectiveness on body composition and body weight outcomes in individuals with overweight and obesity across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. (2022) 23(5):e13428. 10.1111/obr.13428 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson SL, Weeks BK, Weis LJ, Harding AT, Horan SA, Beck BR. High-intensity resistance and impact training improves bone mineral density and physical function in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis: the LIFTMOR randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res. (2018) 33(2):211–20. 10.1002/jbmr.3284 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoon DH, Lee JY, Song W. Effects of resistance exercise training on cognitive function and physical performance in cognitive frailty: a randomized controlled trial. J Nutr Health Aging. (2018) 22(8):944–51. 10.1007/s12603-018-1090-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park W, Jung WS, Hong K, Kim YY, Kim SW, Park HY. Effects of moderate combined resistance- and aerobic-exercise for 12 weeks on body composition, cardiometabolic risk factors, blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and physical functions, among obese older men: a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17(19):7233. 10.3390/ijerph17197233 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources