Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;28(6):1362-1376.
doi: 10.1111/jiec.13509. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Embed systemic equity throughout industrial ecology applications: How to address machine learning unfairness and bias

Affiliations

Embed systemic equity throughout industrial ecology applications: How to address machine learning unfairness and bias

Joe F Bozeman 3rd et al. J Ind Ecol. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Recent calls have been made for equity tools and frameworks to be integrated throughout the research and design life cycle -from conception to implementation-with an emphasis on reducing inequity in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications. Simply stating that equity should be integrated throughout, however, leaves much to be desired as industrial ecology (IE) researchers, practitioners, and decision-makers attempt to employ equitable practices. In this forum piece, we use a critical review approach to explain how socioecological inequities emerge in ML applications across their life cycle stages by leveraging the food system. We exemplify the use of a comprehensive questionnaire to delineate unfair ML bias across data bias, algorithmic bias, and selection and deployment bias categories. Finally, we provide consolidated guidance and tailored strategies to help address AI/ML unfair bias and inequity in IE applications. Specifically, the guidance and tools help to address sensitivity, reliability, and uncertainty challenges. There is also discussion on how bias and inequity in AI/ML affect other IE research and design domains, besides the food system-such as living labs and circularity. We conclude with an explanation of the future directions IE should take to address unfair bias and inequity in AI/ML. Last, we call for systemic equity to be embedded throughout IE applications to fundamentally understand domain-specific socioecological inequities, identify potential unfairness in ML, and select mitigation strategies in a manner that translates across different research domains.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; justice; machine learning; machine learning bias; social equity; unfairness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Venn diagram of the systemic equity framework. Source: From Bozeman Iii, Nobler et al. (2022).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
An overview of distributive, procedural, and recognitional equity factors of the food system across four life cycle stages.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
An overview of how food system life cycle stages link to the data bias, algorithmic bias, and selection and deployment bias categories of Table 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abràmoff, M. D. , Tarver, M. E. , Loyo‐Berrios, N. , Trujillo, S. , Char, D. , Obermeyer, Z. , Eydelman, M. B. , & Maisel, W. H. (2023). Considerations for addressing bias in artificial intelligence for health equity. NPJ Digital Medicine, 6(1), 170–170. 10.1038/s41746-023-00913-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahola, A. J. , Freese, R. , Mäkimattila, S. , Forsblom, C. , & Groop, P. H. (2016). Dietary patterns are associated with various vascular health markers and complications in type 1 diabetes. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 30(6), 1144–1150. 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.03.028 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali, R. , Olden, K. , & Xu, S. (2008). Community‐Based participatory research: A vehicle to promote public engagement for environmental health in China. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(10), 1281–1284. 10.1289/ehp.11399 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkon, A. H. , Block, D. , Moore, K. , Gillis, C. , Dinuccio, N. , & Chavez, N. (2013). Foodways of the urban poor. Geoforum, 48, 126–135. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.021 - DOI
    1. Andresen, S. H. , Krogstie, J. , & Jelle, T. (2007). Lab and research activities at Wireless Trondheim. ISWCS, 7, 385–389.

LinkOut - more resources