Predicting macular hole surgery outcomes: Integrating preoperative OCT features with supervised machine learning statistical models
- PMID: 39723867
- PMCID: PMC11834913
- DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1895_24
Predicting macular hole surgery outcomes: Integrating preoperative OCT features with supervised machine learning statistical models
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate various supervised machine learning (ML) statistical models to predict anatomical outcomes after macular hole (MH) surgery using preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) features.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed OCT data from idiopathic MH eyes at baseline and at 1-month post-surgery. The dataset was split 80:20 between training and testing. XLSTAT® statistical software (Lumivero, USA) was used to train different ML models on 10°CT parameters: prefoveal posterior cortical vitreous status, epiretinal membrane, intraretinal cysts, foveal retinal pigment epithelium hyperreflectivity, MH basal diameter, MH area (MHA), hole-forming factor, MH index, tractional hole index, and diameter hole index. The most effective statistical model was identified and was further assessed for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on a separate testing dataset.
Results: Six ML statistical models were trained on 33,260°CT data points from 3326°CT images of 308 operated MH (300 patients) eyes. Following training and internal validation, the random forest (RF) model achieved the highest accuracy (0.92), precision (0.94), recall (0.97), and F-score (0.96), and lowest misclassification rate. RF model identified the MHA index as the best predictor of post-surgical anatomical success. Following external testing, the RF model confirmed the highest accuracy and lowest misclassification rate (8.8%).
Conclusion: ML-based statistical models can be used to predict MH status after surgery. The RF model was the most accurate ML model, and the MHA index was the best predictor of postoperative hole closure after surgery based on preoperative OCT parameters. These predictions may help with future surgical planning for MH patients.
Copyright © 2024 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of OCT measurements as prognostic factors in myopic macular hole surgery without foveoschisis.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;251(11):2521-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2347-y. Epub 2013 May 22. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23695656
-
Outcomes of amniotic membrane transplant for refractory macular hole - an optical coherence tomography and autofluorescence long-term study.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb;263(2):315-326. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06609-4. Epub 2024 Sep 23. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39311975
-
Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography.Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;120(1):29-35. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.1.29. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002. PMID: 11786054
-
Anatomical and visual outcomes in high myopic macular hole (HM-MH) without retinal detachment: a review.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb;252(2):191-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-013-2555-5. Epub 2014 Jan 3. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 24384802 Review.
-
Pre- and postoperative OCT features and surgical outcomes of advanced retinitis pigmentosa with macular hole: case series and literature review.BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 26;24(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03643-y. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39187836 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Gross JG. Late reopening and spontaneous closure of previously repaired macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:556–8. - PubMed
-
- Ruiz-Moreno JM, Staicu C, Piñero DP, Montero J, Lugo F, Amat P. Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole surgery outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:640–4. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources