Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 May;311(5):1267-1273.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07873-9. Epub 2024 Dec 26.

Safety of vaginal breech delivery following an unsuccessful external cephalic version: a comparative study

Danit Aviv  1   2 , Amir Weintraub  3   4 , Gal Issakov  3   4 , Yael Pasternak  3   4 , Rachel Griffin  3   4 , Tzipora Shochat  5 , Miriam Lopian  6 , Yael Yekel #  3   4 , Sharon Perlman #  6   5
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Safety of vaginal breech delivery following an unsuccessful external cephalic version: a comparative study

Danit Aviv et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether patients undergoing a trial of labor with a breech presentation following a failed attempt of external cephalic version (ECV) are at increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single university-affiliated medical center. The study group comprised women with singleton pregnancies at term, categorized into three groups: those who underwent a failed external cephalic version (ECV) and subsequently attempted a trial of breech delivery (Breech-failed-ECV group), those who attempted an assisted vaginal breech delivery without a prior ECV attempt (Breech-no-ECV group), and those with vertex presentation following a successful ECV (Vertex-ECV). The primary outcome measured was the mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Results: The study group consisted of 229 patients who attempted a vaginal delivery during the study period following a diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation at term. There were 42 women in the Breech failed-ECV group, 102 in the Breech-no-ECV group, and 85 in the Vertex-ECV group. Among patients undergoing a trial of labor with a breech presentation, there were no significant differences in successful vaginal delivery rates between those who had an attempted ECV and those who did not (80.39% vs. 80.95%, p > 0.05), nor in the rate of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes between the groups. However, the Vertex-ECV were more likely to have a vaginal delivery (91.78 vs 80.56%, p = 0.03) and less likely to experience adverse neonatal outcomes, including meconium-stained amniotic fluid, non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR), compared to those who underwent labor with a breech presentation (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: A failed external cephalic version does not adversely affect maternal or neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing a trial of labor with a breech presentation and meet the criteria of our study.

Keywords: Cesarean delivery; External cephalic version; Trial of labor; Vaginal breech delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study is a retrospective study conducted in accordance with ethical standards and approved by our institution’s HELSINKI Committee (approval number 50-22lnd), reaffirming our commitment to ethical research integrity. We diligently adhered to established ethical guidelines, utilizing the retrospective design to analyze pre-existing data and minimize participant burden.

References

    1. Hannah ME et al (2000) Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collabor Group Lancet 356(9239):1375–1383 - PubMed
    1. Tong Leung VK et al (2012) External cephalic version does not increase the risk of intra-uterine death: a 17-year experience and literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25(9):1774–1778 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melo P et al (2019) External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years’ experience. BJOG 126(4):493–499 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM (2015) External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015(4): CD000083 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hibbard LT, Schumann WR (1973) Prophylactic external cephalic version in an obstetric practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 116(4):511–518 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources