Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 26;14(1):108.
doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00586-4.

Business cycle sensitivity of Statutory Health Insurance: evidence from the Czech Republic

Affiliations

Business cycle sensitivity of Statutory Health Insurance: evidence from the Czech Republic

Petra Landovská. Health Econ Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The Statutory Health Insurance scheme is one of two main schemes of health care system financing in Europe. This scheme mainly relies on wage-based contributions from employers and employees and is thus prone to business cycle fluctuations. This turned out to be a problem especially after the 2008 crisis. We estimate the magnitude of the effect of the business cycle on health insurance funds' revenues in the Czech Republic where the health care system financing is based on the Statutory Health Insurance scheme. The relationship between the business cycle and healthcare system's revenues has not been quantified to this date.

Methods: We use static and lagged regression models to estimate the impact of business cycle on health care system's revenues. The business cycle is proxied by eight different indicators (nominal GDP, unemployment, industrial production, recession index, business cycle index, GDP gap, consumer price index and consumer expenditure). Using quarterly data from 2000-2017, we examine the effect of business cycle on total revenues and its two main components: the employer-employee contributions and state contributions.

Results: Health insurance funds' revenues display significant pro-cyclicality, which is mainly driven by employer-employee contributions. Out of all eight business cycle indicators, nominal GDP has the largest effect. In particular, the model estimates that if quarter-over-quarter GDP increases by 1%, then quarter-over-quarter healthcare system's revenues increase by 0.7% and quarter-over-quarter employer-employee contributions increase by 1.1%. The lagged effect of business cycle on healthcare system's revenues is smaller in magnitude. State contributions on behalf of economically inactive people do not display a significant relationship with business cycle in the static nor lagged model. The effect is consistent across different business cycle indicators, although the magnitudes of the effect vary.

Conclusion: The results show large pro-cyclicality in healthcare system's revenues in Statutory Health Insurance schemes. Counter-cyclical mechanisms are needed to offset this loss of revenues during economic downturns to ensure sufficient resources in healthcare.

Keywords: Business cycle; Czech Republic; Health system financing; Statutory Health Insurance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Composition of insurance funds’ inflows
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Evaluation of residuals in static model with total revenues as dependent variable
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Evaluation of residuals in static model with contributions from employees as dependent variable
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Evaluation of residuals in static model with state contributions as dependent variable
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Evaluation of residuals in lagged model with total revenues as dependent variable
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Evaluation of residuals in lagged model with contributions from employees as dependent variable
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Evaluation of residuals in lagged model with state contributions as dependent variable

Similar articles

References

    1. Jakubowski E, et al.. Health care systems in the EU: a comparative study. EPRS: European Parliamentary Research Service. Belgium; 1998. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/workingpapers/saco/pdf/101_en.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2020.
    1. Economou C, Kaitelidou D, Karanikolos M, Maresso A. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe and European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Greece: health system review. Health Systems in Transition, vol. 19 (5). Geneva: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2017. - PubMed
    1. Koppel A, Kahur K, Habicht T, Saar P, Habicht J, van Ginneken Ewout. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe and European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Estonia: health system review. Health Systems in Transition, vol. 10 (1). Geneva: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2008.
    1. Maresso A, Mladovsky P, Thomson S, Sagan A, Karanikolos M, Richardson E, Cylus J, Evetovits T, Jowett M, Figueras J, Kluge H. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Economic crisis, health systems and health in Europe: country experience. Observatory Studies Series: 41. Geneva: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2015. - PubMed
    1. Habicht T, Reinap M, Kasekamp K, Habicht J, van Ginneken E, Webb E. The 2017 reform to improve financial sustainability of national health insurance in Estonia: Analysis and first lessons on broadening the revenue base. Health Policy. 2019;123(8):695–9. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.05.019. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources