Mifepristone versus Foley balloon catheter for outpatient cervical ripening at term: A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 39724777
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.12.035
Mifepristone versus Foley balloon catheter for outpatient cervical ripening at term: A non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether the success rate of oral mifepristone was not inferior to that of Foley balloon catheter for outpatient cervical ripening of term pregnancies, and whether there were differences in side effects for mothers and newborns.
Design: Open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.
Setting: A tertiary care European university hospital in an urban setting.
Population or sample: A total of 101 women with a Bishop's score < 6 and with an indication for outpatient cervical ripening at term.
Methods: Participants were randomly allocated to receive either mifepristone 200 mg per os, or an intracervical Foley catheter balloon.
Main outcomes measures: Women going into labour in the first 24 h after the intervention or with a favourable Bishop's score (≥6) at the first re-evaluation, conducted 18-24 h after the intervention. We hypothesized that the incidence of the main outcome in the mifepristone group would be similar to that of the Foley balloon catheter group, within a margin of 10 %.
Results: Onset of labour or favourable Bishop's score were achieved in 33.3 % of women receiving mifepristone and 30.2 % of those receiving the Foley balloon catheter (risk difference 0.03, 95 % confidence intervals -0.15 to 0.21). This confidence interval indicates that mifepristone can be 21 % superior but can also be 15 % inferior to the Foley catheter balloon, therefore not meeting our non-inferiority target of less than 10 %.
Conclusions: Similar rates of onset of labour or favourable Bishop's score were achieved with mifepristone and Foley balloon catheter in outpatient cervical ripening at term, but mifepristone could not be shown to be noninferior.
Keywords: Bishop’s score; Cervical ripening; Failed induction; Foley catheter balloon; Induction of labour; Mifepristone.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Cervical ripening with Foley catheter balloon: A prospective cohort of 320 women.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Aug;170(2):768-773. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70088. Epub 2025 Mar 27. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 40145375
-
Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.Am J Perinatol. 2021 Aug;38(S 01):e123-e128. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1708805. Epub 2020 Apr 16. Am J Perinatol. 2021. PMID: 32299108 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of the Foley catheter and synchronous low dose misoprostol administration on cervical ripening: a randomised controlled trial.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Aug;33(6):572-7. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.786030. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013. PMID: 23919853 Clinical Trial.
-
Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13251. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013251. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30508911 Free PMC article.
-
Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review.BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 29211328
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources