Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 26;24(1):862.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07047-0.

Conceiving during the first postoperative year after bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of pregnancy outcomes

Affiliations

Conceiving during the first postoperative year after bariatric surgery: a retrospective study of pregnancy outcomes

Sesilia Kaukonen et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of childbearing-aged women have undergone bariatric surgery (BS). Although pregnancy outcomes generally improve after BS, concern remains over the impact of rapid weight loss and the catabolic state that occurs soon after BS. At least a 12-month surgery-to-conception time (SCT) is recommended, though the reasoning behind this has been questioned. This retrospective study was conducted to compare post-BS pregnancies with SCTs of less (Group 1) or more (Group 2) than 12 months.

Methods: The Hospital Register and Finnish Medical Birth Register were queried for data on BS and subsequent pregnancies. The characteristics of women at surgery and maternal and newborn outcomes in post-BS pregnancies were collected.

Results: Between 2010 and 2022, 113 women gave birth after BS. This included 17 and 96 patients in Groups 1 and 2. The mean SCTs were 8.0 ± 2.7 and 39.0 ± 24.3 months (p < 0.001), respectively. At BS, the characteristics of age (p = 0.316), weight (p = 0.718), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.114) and surgical technique used (p = 0.648) were similar. During pregnancy, the mean age of Group 1 women was significantly lower (p = 0.005). With no difference in weight (p = 0.961) or BMI (p = 0.567), the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, p = 0.039) was higher in Group 2. The mean gestational age at delivery (p = 0.206) and incidence rates of preterm (p = 0.645), post-term (p = 1.00) and caesarean deliveries (p = 1.00) in the groups were similar. A significantly higher incidence of delivery induction (p < 0.001 was detected in Group 2. The mean newborn weight in Group 1 was lower (p = 0.038), but the mean birth weight standard deviation (p = 0.883) and incidences of low birth weight (< 2500 g, p = 0.345) and small-for-gestational-age newborns (p = 0.469) were similar. The 1- (p = 0.191) and 5-min (p = 0.174) Apgar points in the groups were similar, and no associations between pregnancy outcomes and surgery technique were detected.

Conclusions: The outcome in pregnancies with an SCT 12 months, postponing pregnancy may not always improve pregnancy outcomes. Therefore, all risks should be weighed when counselling women regarding the optimal time of pregnancy after BS.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Low birth weight; Newborn outcome; Obesity; Pregnancy outcome; Preterm delivery; Small for gestational age; Surgery-to-conception-time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: Ethics approval was not needed for this retrospective study. According to Finnish legislation, informed consent from patients is not required for this type of retrospective study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Schmidt M, Schaefer-Graf UM. The German guideline obesity in pregnancy: comparison with the international approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;309(5):1699–705. 10.1007/s00404-023-07314-z. - PubMed
    1. Orós M, Lorenzo M, Serna MC, Siscart J, Perejón D, Salinas-Roca B. Obesity in pregnancy as a risk factor in maternal and child health-a retrospective cohort study. Metabolites. 2024;14(1):56. 10.3390/metabo14010056. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vats H, Saxena R, Sachdeva MP, Walia GK, Gupta V. Impact of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index on maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse outcomes in the worldwide populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Nov-Dec;15(6):536–45. 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.10.005. - PubMed
    1. Simko M, Totka A, Vondrova D, Samohyl M, Jurkovicova J, Trnka Met. Maternal body mass index and gestational weight gain and their association with pregnancy complications and perinatal conditions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(10):1751. 10.3390/ijerph16101751. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salmeri N, Seidenari A, Cavoretto PI, Papale M, Candiani M, Farina A. Maternal prepregnancy weight as an independent risk factor for congenital heart defect: systematic review and meta-analysis stratified by subtype and severity of defect. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;64(3):294–307. 10.1002/uog.27659. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources