Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 26;24(1):1551.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05296-1.

Assessment of oral hygiene parameters in association to eating behaviors and healthy eating self-efficacy in school-aged children

Affiliations

Assessment of oral hygiene parameters in association to eating behaviors and healthy eating self-efficacy in school-aged children

Seda Ceren Gökçek et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Eating behavior are a broad category influenced by a various personal, social, cultural, environmental, and economic factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the oral hygiene status of school-aged children in relation to their eating behavior and healthy eating self-efficacy.

Methods: The study was carried out with the participation of 225 children aged 7-9 years. Parents carried out the Children's Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ) to assess eating behaviors and provided sociodemographic information. Oral examinations of the children were provided according to plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), simplified oral hygiene index (OHI-S), dmft and DMFT and, the Healthy Eating Self-Efficacy Scale (HESES) was administered to the children. For statistical analysis, a consistent partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) technique was utilized.

Results: A statistically significant negative correlation was found between the Healthy Eating Self-Efficacy Scale and the PI, GI, OHI-S, dmfs (p < 0.001) and DMFS (p = 0.002). Emotional undereating significantly negatively affected dmfs (p = 0.021), while emotional overeating had a significant positive effect on DMFS (p = 0.036). None of the eating behavior subgroups in children showed a significant relationship with self-efficacy. Additionally, higher self-efficacy (p = 0.001) and food fussiness (p = 0.001) were found in children from high-income families, while emotional overeating (p < 0.001) and desire to drink (p = 0.009) were observed in children from middle-income families.

Conclusion: This study reveals a significant relationship between healthy eating self-efficacy and oral hygiene in children. Higher self-efficacy correlates with better oral health, while emotional eating negatively impacts dental outcomes. Socioeconomic factors also play a role, suggesting that interventions should target self-efficacy and emotional eating to improve both eating behaviors and oral health in school-aged children.

Keywords: Dental caries; Eating behavior; Family income; Healthy eating self-efficacy; Periodontal parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by The Research Ethical Board of Altınbaş University Faculty of Dentistry (2022/166). Written informed consent was obtained from all parents. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Çağlar E, Kuşcu ÖÖ. The role of Diet in Caries Prevention. In: Eden E, editor. Evidence-based Caries Prevention. Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 87–106.
    1. Moynihan P. Sugars and dental caries: evidence for setting a recommended threshold for intake. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(1):149–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet. 2007;369(9555):51–9. - PubMed
    1. LaCaille L, Behavior E. Eating Behavior. In: Gellman MD, Turner JR, editors. Editors Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine [internet]. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. pp. 641–2.
    1. Cooke LJ, Wardle J. Age and gender differences in children’s food preferences. Br J Nutr. 2005;93(5):741–6. - PubMed