PSA testing in primary care: is it time to change our practice?
- PMID: 39725949
- PMCID: PMC11670451
- DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02688-8
PSA testing in primary care: is it time to change our practice?
Abstract
Background: Historical prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening studies reduced prostate cancer-related deaths but also led to overdiagnosis/overtreatment. Since then, opportunistic PSA testing has increased, and late-stage diagnoses and prostate-cancer related deaths are rising.
Objectives: To review current trends regarding PSA testing in primary care and propose a collaborative approach to improve early prostate cancer detection.
Discussion: Opportunistic PSA testing patterns vary among General Practitioners (GPs) and Family Doctors (FDs) based on differing guidelines, patient pressure, time constraints and personal views/preferences. However, an organised, risk-adapted strategy, as outlined by the European Association of Urology's guidelines, could facilitate the early diagnosis of significant prostate cancer whilst sparing those unlikely to experience disease-related symptoms from further tests (overdiagnosis) as well as the psychosocial consequences of a cancer diagnosis. This could be achieved by the introduction of national prostate cancer screening programmes, which has been endorsed in the European Commission's publication of the EU Cancer Screening Recommendations. In this scenario, GPs/FDs would still play an important role in supporting men throughout the decision pathway. However, as some men may still request a PSA test from their GP/FD, patient information as well as clear guidance and support to GPs/FDs are needed, including appropriate skills training to facilitate effective counselling and informed decision-making, and the use of risk calculators to inform referral decisions.
Conclusion: GPs/FDs play an important role in counselling healthy men eligible to consider PSA testing. However, clear guidance, training and support is required for them to assume this role.
Keywords: Primary care; Prostate cancer; Prostate-specific antigen; Screening.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The research did not require ethical approval as the study did not use human beings. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Public Health England. Advising well men about the PSA test for prostate cancer: information for GPs. 2020. [cited 2021 June 29]; Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prostate-specific-antigen-tes....
-
- Brodersen J, et al. Overdiagnosis: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(1):1–3. - PubMed
-
- Venderbos LDF, et al. Europa Uomo Patient Reported Outcome Study (EUPROMS): Descriptive Statistics of a Prostate Cancer Survey from Patients for Patients. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(5):987–94. - PubMed
-
- Duffy MJ. PSA in screening for prostate cancer: more good than harm or more harm than good? Adv Clin Chem. 2014;66:1–23. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous