Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 26;16(11):e74509.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.74509. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Bitter Taste Sensitivity, Food Cravings, and Risk of Chronic Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Bitter Taste Sensitivity, Food Cravings, and Risk of Chronic Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study

Tony Jehi et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction: Variation in common taste receptor type 2 member 38 (TAS2R38) haplotypes is associated with bitter taste sensitivity, but there is not much or inconsistent evidence on association with food cravings and with chronic disease risk factors. We have conducted a cross-sectional study to assess whether genetically defined taster groups would differ in their sensitivity to bitter-tasting compounds, cravings for various food groups, and risk of chronic disease risk factors. Methodology: A total of 116 non-diabetic individuals were recruited from the Loma Linda University (LLU) campus. Various measures were carried out to examine genetic variations, bitter sensitivity, anthropometrics, food cravings, and participant demographics. Taster status was determined based on TAS2R38 haplotypes, classifying participants as super-tasters, tasters, or non-tasters. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to examine differences among the three TAS2R38 genetic groups in bitter taste sensitivity, food cravings, body mass index (BMI), non-fasting blood glucose, and family history of type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Results: A significant difference in sensitivity to the bitter taste compounds thiourea and phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) was observed among the three TAS2R38 genetic groups (P < 0.01). The sensitivity scores of the bitter taste compounds thiourea and PTC were lowest for super-tasters and highest for non-tasters (-41.283 and -0.233 for thiourea; -32.983 and 3.380 for PTC, respectively). Moreover, super-tasters had a significantly higher cravings score than non-tasters for starchy foods (2.641 vs. 2.183, respectively). Tasters had a significantly higher cravings score than non-tasters for bitter foods (2.306 vs. 1.740, respectively). No significant differences were observed across the TAS2R38 genetic-based taste groups for the chronic disease risk factors, BMI non-fasting blood glucose, and family history of T2D.

Conclusions: Super-tasters had the lowest taste sensitivity for bitter compounds and the highest cravings for bitter foods, which suggests that they might be more likely to consume bitter foods. Examining the genetic differences in taste preferences and sensitivities may pave the way for effective and individualized dietary plans and intervention strategies targeting chronic disease prevention, treatment, and management.

Keywords: bitter taste; chronic disease risk; food cravings; tas2r38; taste sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Loma Linda University (LLU) issued approval 5140380. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Strengthening national nutrition research: rationale and options for a new coordinated federal research effort and authority. Fleischhacker SE, Woteki CE, Coates PM, et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa179. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112:721–769. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. JAMA. 2012;307:491–497. - PubMed
    1. National Center for Health Statistics. Tables of Summary Health Statistics for U.S. Adults: 2018 National Health Interview Survey. adults. [ Sep; 2024 ]. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/shs/tables.htm https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/shs/tables.htm
    1. National health care spending in 2019: steady growth for the fourth consecutive year. Martin AB, Hartman M, Lassman D, Catlin A. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.02022. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021;40:14–24. - PubMed
    1. Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Dodd KW. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.110.124826. J Nutr. 2010;140:1832–1838. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources