Psychometric properties and validation of the metacognitive self-assessment scale (MSAS) in a Turkish sample
- PMID: 39726613
- PMCID: PMC11670667
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1411733
Psychometric properties and validation of the metacognitive self-assessment scale (MSAS) in a Turkish sample
Abstract
Objective: Metacognition, a multifaceted psychological construct, encompasses recognising and explaining one's cognitive processes and those of others. Notably, deficits in metacognitive abilities are linked with diminished social performance, reduced quality of life, and increased severity of Personality Disorders (PD). While there are other assessment tools available in Turkish for evaluating metacognition, none offer the same combination of speed, simplicity, flexibility, and multidimensionality for screening metacognitive abilities as the Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS).The Metacognitive Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS) was designed to evaluate various metacognitive functions-namely, Monitoring, Integration, Differentiation, and Disintegration-as described by the Metacognitive Multifunction Model. This study aims to translate and validate the MSAS for Turkish culture.
Method: To check the factor structure's suitability for the Turkish population, 467 non-clinical participants (67.7% female, ranged from 18 to 31, mean 24.18; ±3.25) were included.
Results: Initial analyses confirm that the scale is a valid and dependable instrument for Turkish culture. Construct validity, represented by the 18 items and four subscales, was confirmed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and criterion validity assessments. As well as the test-retest reliability of the scale was confirmed. Based on these findings, it was concluded that the scale is valid and reliable for use in Turkey. The model aligns well with empirical data, highlighting its strong construct validity and indicating good reliability of the scale.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the MSAS, developed to measure metacognition and its associated components, has proven to be a credible and reliable tool, especially in non-clinical settings.
Keywords: assessment; metacognition; reliability; scale; validity.
Copyright © 2024 Yılmazer, Hamamcı and Türk.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Metacognitive self-assessment scale: psychometric properties and clinical implications.Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Sep-Oct;28(5):596-606. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1671843. Epub 2019 Oct 24. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021. PMID: 31646901
-
[Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 for the Turkish population, and its relationship to anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms].Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008 Spring;19(1):67-80. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008. PMID: 18330745 Turkish.
-
Insight across mental disorders: A multifaceted metacognitive phenomenon.Psychiatriki. 2019 Jan-Mar;30(1):13-16. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2019.301.13. Psychiatriki. 2019. PMID: 31115349 English, Greek, Modern.
-
[Characteristics and impact of metacognitive deficits in schizophrenia].Encephale. 2013 Apr;39(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Dec 6. Encephale. 2013. PMID: 23219408 Review. French.
-
Metacognitive monitoring in schizotypy: Systematic literature review and new empirical data.J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2023 Dec;81:101891. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101891. Epub 2023 Jul 8. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 37453406
Cited by
-
Metacognition and Personality Functioning Levels as Mediators Between Maladaptive Personality Traits and Risk of Gambling Problems in a Non-Clinical Sample.Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025 Apr;22(2):149-159. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250205. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40401143 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baron-Cohen S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-
- Bateman A., Fonagy P. (2006). “Mentalising and borderline personality disorder” in The handbook of mentalisation-based treatment. eds. Allen J. G., Fonagy P. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 185–200.
-
- Byrne B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, Routledge.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials