Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 12:12:1454537.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454537. eCollection 2024.

Division of childcare policy actors under health-oriented goals: thematic analysis of China's policy texts from the social constructionist perspective

Linan Li  1 , Junyu Li  2
Affiliations

Division of childcare policy actors under health-oriented goals: thematic analysis of China's policy texts from the social constructionist perspective

Linan Li et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Ensuring child health, as a key objective of global childcare policies, requires coordinated efforts between the government, social organizations and communities, institutions, and families. Despite China's progress in comprehensive childcare policy development, rapid economic growth, and urbanization, challenges persist, such as urban-rural disparities and unequal resource distribution, highlighting the need for effective collaboration between policy actors.

Methods: To collect textual data, this study searched for prefectural-level childcare policy texts issued since 2019 on government websites and legal databases, ultimately identifying 224 documents for analysis. This study reviewed the literature on the impact of childcare policies on child health and identified the enhancement of childcare quality as a current research focus. This study then conducted a content analysis using Nvivo12 Plus software and coded and analyzed the childcare policy content. Finally, it applied social construction theory to interpret the policy documents.

Results: Childcare policies were centered around child health and formed a responsibility and accountability framework between the government, social organizations and communities, institutions, and families, whose action shares accounted for 38.9, 22.89, 29.05, and 9.16%, respectively. The development of childcare institutions was a key aspect of the defamilialization trend. Compared to other policy actors, institutions played a larger role in child health policy aspects such as safety management (12.97%), health and hygiene (8.56%), and scientific parenting (10.93%).

Conclusion: Within China's health-oriented framework, the refamilialization and defamilialization processes coexist in terms of childcare policies, and limited community-based childcare resources extend beyond the family. The participation of diverse policy actors in China's childcare system is expected to persist, underscoring the increased need to enhance the policy actors' negotiation skills and bolster community-based childcare services in the future.

Keywords: China; childcare policies; health-oriented goal; policy actor; social construction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Childcare policy text screening process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Temporal distribution of prefectural-level policy texts.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Provincial distribution of prefectural-level policy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Word cloud of Chinese childcare policy texts.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Richter LM, Daelmans B, Lombardi J, Heymann J, Boo FL, Behrman JR, et al. . Investing in the foundation of sustainable development: pathways to scale for early childhood development. Lancet. (2017) 389:103–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31698-1, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lokteff M, Piercy KW. “Who cares for the children?” lessons from a global perspective of child care policy. J Child Fam Stud. (2012) 21:120–30. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9467-y - DOI
    1. Wüst M. Universal early-life health policies in the Nordic countries. J Econ Perspect. (2022) 36:175–98. doi: 10.1257/jep.36.2.175 - DOI
    1. Ellingsæter AL, Kitterød RH, Lyngstad J. Universalising childcare, changing mothers’ attitudes: policy feedback in Norway. J Soc Policy. (2017) 46:149–73. doi: 10.1017/S0047279416000349 - DOI
    1. Urmańska-Maruszak A, Suwada K. Familialisation of care in European societies: between family and the state In: Castrén AM, Česnuitytė V, Crespi I, Gauthier JA, Gouveia R, Martin C, et al., editors. The Palgrave handbook of family sociology in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan; (2021). 205–21.