Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 17;12(12):411.
doi: 10.3390/dj12120411.

Evaluation of Facial Aesthetic Changes in Growing Class II Patients Treated with Herbst or Elastodontics: A Retrospective Study

Affiliations

Evaluation of Facial Aesthetic Changes in Growing Class II Patients Treated with Herbst or Elastodontics: A Retrospective Study

Domenico Ciavarella et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the facial profile changes of patients treated for class II skeletal malocclusions with an elastodontic appliance compared to those treated with the Herbst appliance and a control group. Methods: Forty class II patients were treated using an elastodontic appliance (Group EA) and were compared to 40 patients treated with the Herbst appliance (Group H) and to 40 untreated class II children (Group C). Aesthetic profile variables were analysed using Arnett's analysis. Cephalograms were compared pre-treatment (T0) and post-treatment (T1). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired-samples t-test was used for pairwise comparison of cephalometric measurements taken at T0 and T1. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test were performed to assess differences between the groups. Results: In the elastodontic group, the inclination of the upper incisors increased by 4.05°. In addition, the Pog-TVL and B-TVL distances decreased by 2.84 mm and 1.79 mm, respectively. In patients treated with an elastodontic appliance, the inclination of the upper incisors increased by 4.05°. In addition, the Pog-TVL and B-TVL distances decreased by 2.84 mm and 1.79 mm, respectively. In patients treated with the Herbst appliance, the inclination of the lower incisors increased by 6.11°. Furthermore, the treatment resulted in reductions in the Pog-TVL distance (2.58 mm), the B-TVL distance (2.26 mm), and the LL-TVL distance (2.31 mm). Conclusions: The profile changes achieved by both devices are favourable for correcting class II skeletal malocclusion.

Keywords: Herbst; elastodontics; facial aesthetic; profile changes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The clinical photos of the Herbst appliance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The clinical photos of the Elastodontic appliance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cephalometric landmarks and reference lines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alhammadi M.S., Halboub E., Fayed M.S., Labib A., El-Saaidi C. Global distribution of malocclusion traits: A systematic review. Dent. Press. J. Orthod. 2018;23:40.e1–40.e10. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.6.40.e1-10.onl. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bock N.C., von Bremen J., Ruf S. Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy—A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Orthod. 2016;38:129–139. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Angle E.H. Classification of malocclusion. Dent. Cosmos. 1899;41:350–357.
    1. McNamara J.A., Jr. Components of class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:177–202. - PubMed
    1. von Bremen J., Erbe C., Pancherz H., Ruf S. Facial-profile attractiveness changes in adult patients treated with the Herbst appliance. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2014;75:167–174. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0210-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources