Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 19;14(4):4091-4108.
doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040298.

Conscience at the End of Life

Ralph Neil Baergen  1 , James Skidmore  1
Affiliations
Review

Conscience at the End of Life

Ralph Neil Baergen et al. Nurs Rep. .

Abstract

Background/objectives: Caring for patients at the end of life can involve issues that are ethically and legally fraught: withholding or withdrawing artificial nutrition and hydration, pain control that could hasten death, aggressive treatment that is continued when it seems only to be prolonging suffering, patients who request medical assistance in dying, and so forth. Clinicians may find that their deeply held ethical principles conflict with law, institutional policy, or patients' choices. In these situations, they may consider either refusing to participate in procedures that they find morally abhorrent (conscientious refusal) or providing care that they believe to be ethically obligatory despite being contrary to law or policy (conscientious commitment).

Methods: This paper reviews the ethical issues involved.

Results: Each of the usual policies for handling conscientious refusals faces serious challenges.

Conclusions: Healthcare providers who refuse to provide medical services should be expected to explain their reasons, make prompt referrals, and bear some of the resulting costs or burdens.

Keywords: conscientious commitment; conscientious refusal; end of life; healthcare law; medical ethics; nursing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Rubin R. Critics say new State “conscience laws” give physicians carte blanche to refuse patients. JAMA. 2023;330:1720–1722. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.19290. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wicclair M. Conscientious Objection in Medicine. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2024. Cambridge Elements, Bioethics and Neuroethics.
    1. Wester G. Conscientious Objection by Health Care Professionals. Philos. Compass. 2015;10:427–437. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12235. - DOI
    1. Asayesh H., Mosavi M., Abdi M., Masoud M.P., Jodaki K. The relationship between futile care perception and moral distress among intensive care unit nurses. J. Med. Ethics Hist. Med. 2018;11:2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curlin F.A., Nwodim C., Vance J.L., Chin M.H., Lantos J.D. To die, to sleep: US physicians’ religious and other objections to physician-assisted suicide, terminal sedation, and withdrawal of life support. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care. 2008;25:112–120. doi: 10.1177/1049909107310141. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources