Education for Healthcare Providers: Impact of Academic Detailing on Reducing Misinformation and Strengthening Influenza Vaccine Recommendations
- PMID: 39728853
- PMCID: PMC11678551
- DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy12060188
Education for Healthcare Providers: Impact of Academic Detailing on Reducing Misinformation and Strengthening Influenza Vaccine Recommendations
Abstract
Background: Recommendations from a trusted healthcare provider have been shown to be the most effective intervention for encouraging patients to be vaccinated. However, providers have reported feeling less prepared to address vaccination questions and having less time to discuss vaccines with patients than before the COVID-19 pandemic. Providers may benefit from a brief update about the available influenza vaccines and vaccination guidelines. Academic detailing is an evidence-based approach for preparing healthcare providers to discuss getting vaccinated with patients.
Methods: An academic detailing presentation was developed using influenza statistics, vaccination recommendations, and recent local and national immunization rate data. Academic detailing was conducted with physicians and community pharmacy personnel in Yakima County, Washington, between November 2023 and January 2024. Yakima County is designated as a medically underserved area due to a lack of providers. A pre-detailing survey was conducted to evaluate participant knowledge of current ACIP recommendations and gather opinions about local resident vaccination barriers. A post-detailing survey was conducted to gather participants' opinions about the value of detailing.
Results: Prior to the training, 73% of providers believed it was important to discuss influenza vaccination with patients, but only 52% felt confident in combating misinformation. Healthcare providers believed misinformation and vaccine hesitancy are the most common barriers for Yakima County patients, but recent survey results showed that online scheduling systems, long wait times, and limited appointment hours were the predominant issues reported locally. Two out of 12 community pharmacy personnel and zero resident physicians correctly named all three preferentially recommended influenza vaccines for patients 65 years and older. Overall, 96% of detailing participants reported that the session was valuable, 87% believed it would help them combat vaccine misinformation, and 65% reported planning to have more conversations with patients about influenza vaccination after participating.
Conclusion: Physicians and community pharmacy immunizers found the influenza vaccines academic detailing to be valuable. Staying up to date on vaccination guidelines can prepare providers to be confident in having informed conversations with patients about getting vaccinated.
Keywords: academic detailing; healthcare provider education; influenza vaccination; vaccination barriers.
Conflict of interest statement
Author Juliet Dang was employed by the company CSL Seqirus. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Exploring Patient Trust in Healthcare Provider Influenza Vaccine Information and Recommendations in a Medically Underserved Area of Washington State.Vaccines (Basel). 2025 May 10;13(5):505. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050505. Vaccines (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40432115 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Factors That Influence Influenza Vaccination Uptake among Pregnant People in a Medically Underserved Area in Washington State.Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jul 13;12(7):768. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12070768. Vaccines (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39066406 Free PMC article.
-
Improving Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates among Rural Older Adults through Academic Detailing: Medicine, Nursing and Pharmacy Partnership.Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 31;9(4):317. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9040317. Vaccines (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33807141 Free PMC article.
-
Healthcare workers' perceptions and experiences of communicating with people over 50 years of age about vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013706. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013706.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34282603 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing vaccine hesitancy and resistance for COVID-19 vaccines.Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jul;131:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104241. Epub 2022 Apr 1. Int J Nurs Stud. 2022. PMID: 35489108 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Flu Burden. [(accessed on 23 October 2024)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/flu-burden/php/about/index.html.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Influenza Activity in the United States During the 2023–2024 Season and Composition of the 2024–2025 Influenza Vaccine. [(accessed on 23 October 2024)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/whats-new/flu-summary-2023-2024.html.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Influenza Vaccination Coverage for Persons 6 Months and Older. [(accessed on 23 October 2024)]; Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/fluvaxview/interactive/general-population-coverage.h....
-
- Grohskopf L.A., Ferdinands J.M., Blanton L.H., Broder K.R., Loehr J. Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, 2024–2025 Influenza Season. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2024;73:1–25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7305a1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Grohskopf L.A., Blanton L.H., Ferdinands J.M., Chung J.R., Broder K.R., Talbot H.K. Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices—United States, 2023–2024 Influenza Season. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2023;72:1–25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7202a1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources