Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;39(3):505-515.
doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01259-7. Epub 2024 Dec 27.

Automated and reference methods for the calculation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral or ejection fraction by non-cardiologists: a systematic review on the agreement of the two methods

Filipe André Gonzalez  1   2   3 , Mateusz Zawadka  4 , Rita Varudo  5 , Simone Messina  6 , Alessandro Caruso  6 , Cristina Santonocito  6 , Michel Slama  7 , Filippo Sanfilippo  8   9
Affiliations

Automated and reference methods for the calculation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral or ejection fraction by non-cardiologists: a systematic review on the agreement of the two methods

Filipe André Gonzalez et al. J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Echocardiography is crucial for evaluating patients at risk of clinical deterioration. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and velocity time integral (VTI) aid in diagnosing shock, but bedside calculations can be time-consuming and prone to variability. Artificial intelligence technology shows promise in providing assistance to clinicians performing point-of-care echocardiography. We conducted a systematic review, utilizing a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, to evaluate the interchangeability of LVEF and/or VTI measurements obtained through automated mode as compared to the echocardiographic reference methods in non-cardiology settings, e.g., Simpson´s method (LVEF) or manual trace (VTI). Eight studies were included, four studying automated-LVEF, three automated-VTI, and one both. When reported, the feasibility of automated measurements ranged from 78.4 to 93.3%. The automated-LVEF had a mean bias ranging from 0 to 2.9% for experienced operators and from 0% to -10.2% for non-experienced ones, but in both cases, with wide limits of agreement (LoA). For the automated-VTI, the mean bias ranged between - 1.7 cm and - 1.9 cm. The correlation between automated and reference methods for automated-LVEF ranged between 0.63 and 0.86 for experienced and between 0.56 and 0.81 for non-experienced operators. Only one study reported a correlation between automated-VTI and manual VTI (0.86 for experienced and 0.79 for non-experienced operators). We found limited studies reporting the interchangeability of automated LVEF or VTI measurements versus a reference approach. The accuracy and precision of these automated methods should be considered within the clinical context and decision-making. Such variability could be acceptable, especially in the hands of trained operators. PROSPERO number CRD42024564868.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Critical care; Echocardiography; Left ventricle ejection fraction; Velocity time integral.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Since it was a systematic review, no Ethics approval, informed consent, or publication consent was required. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Robba C, Wong A, Poole D, Al Tayar A, Arntfield RT, Chew MS, Corradi F, Douflé G, Goffi A, Lamperti M, et al. Basic Ultrasound Head-to-toe skills for intensivists in the General and neuro intensive care unit population: consensus and expert recommendations of the european society of intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47:1347–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00134-021-06486-Z . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Wong A, Galarza L, Forni L, De Backer D, Slama M, Cholley B, Mayo P, McLean A, Vieillard-Baron A, Lichtenstein D, et al. Recommendations for core critical care Ultrasound competencies as a part of specialist training in Multidisciplinary Intensive Care: a Framework proposed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). Crit Care. 2020;24:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13054-020-03099-8/TABLES/2 . - DOI
    1. Rajamani A, Galarza L, Sanfilippo F, Wong A, Goffi A, Tuinman P, Mayo P, Arntfield R, Fisher R, Chew M, et al. Criteria, processes, and determination of competence in basic critical care Echocardiography Training: a Delphi process Consensus Statement by the learning ultrasound in critical care (LUCC) Initiative. Chest. 2022;161:492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHEST.2021.08.077/ATTACHMENT/C5FB0AB1-8FC6-42D... . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and Hemodynamic Monitoring. Task Force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1795–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00134-014-3525-Z . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Vieillard-Baron A, Millington SJ, Sanfilippo F, Chew M, Diaz-Gomez J, McLean A, Pinsky MR, Pulido J, Mayo P, Fletcher N. A decade of progress in critical Care Echocardiography: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:770–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05604-2 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources