Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 27;19(12):e0315218.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315218. eCollection 2024.

Configurations associated with the efficiency of the ophthalmology departments in public hospitals of Central South China

Yimeng Li  1 , Yao Chen  1 , Bosheng Ma  2 , Jyu-Lin Chen  3 , Jie Zhong  4 , Yan Jiang  1 , Jing Luo  2 , Jia Guo  1
Affiliations

Configurations associated with the efficiency of the ophthalmology departments in public hospitals of Central South China

Yimeng Li et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Improving the efficiency of ophthalmology service is a global challenge to fight vision impairment, yet there is little concrete evidence of the current efficiency status. This study aimed to examine the efficiency of ophthalmology departments in the Hunan Province, China, and determine the associating factors of low-efficiency and high-efficiency ophthalmology departments.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included a province-level survey of ophthalmology departments of public hospitals. All the ophthalmology departments of public hospitals in Hunan Province were invited to complete an online survey on ophthalmic competence resources. Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis was conducted to describe the service efficiency status of the ophthalmology departments using Maxdea (version 8.0) software. Then, we employed Fuzzy Set-Qualitative Comparative Analysis to explore the recipes of low-efficiency and high-efficiency ophthalmology departments using Fs-QCA (version 3.0) software.

Results: One hundred and ninety-five ophthalmology departments (87 in tertiary and 108 in secondary public hospitals) completed the survey. The mean efficiency score was 0.78 for ophthalmology departments in tertiary hospitals and 0.82 for secondary hospitals. The number of ophthalmologists and equipment positively contributed to the efficiency of ophthalmology departments in tertiary and secondary hospitals. While increasing the bed capacity was not always beneficial to improving the efficiency of ophthalmology departments in secondary hospitals. For ophthalmology departments in tertiary hospitals, simply increasing the number of nurses did not universally increase efficiency unless there were enough ophthalmologists and equipment to support the nurses' work. This study also revealed 2 configurations for ophthalmology departments in secondary hospitals and 5 configurations for those in tertiary hospitals that could guide their efficiency improvement efforts.

Conclusions: Moderate efficiency levels in ophthalmology departments at both tertiary and secondary hospitals were found. Prioritizing the number of ophthalmologists and equipment was recommended to achieve high efficiency for ophthalmology departments in tertiary and secondary hospitals. We also proposed that blindly increasing the number of beds and nurses was meaningless, and ophthalmology departments should flex the bed capacity and number of nurses after premising having high numbers of ophthalmologists and equipment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Distribution of the efficiency score of ophthalmology departments in secondary hospitals.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Distribution of the efficiency score of ophthalmology departments in tertiary hospitals.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Ehrlich JR, Stagg BC, Andrews C, Kumagai A, Musch DC. Vision Impairment and Receipt of Eye Care Among Older Adults in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137: 146–158. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.5449 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, et al.. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5: e1221–e1234. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stevens GA, White RA, Flaxman SR, Price H, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, et al.. Global prevalence of vision impairment and blindness: magnitude and temporal trends, 1990–2010. Ophthalmology. 2013;120: 2377–2384. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahmed M, Whitestone N, Patnaik JL, Hossain MA, Husain L, Alauddin M, et al.. Burden of eye disease and demand for care in the Bangladesh Rohingya displaced population and host community: A cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020;17: e1003096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003096 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. An L, Jan CL, Feng J, Wang Z, Zhan L, Xu X. Inequity in Access: Cataract Surgery Throughput of Chinese Ophthalmologists from the China National Eye Care Capacity and Resource Survey. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2020;27: 29–38. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2019.1678654 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources