Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 27;19(12):e0315244.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315244. eCollection 2024.

Is increased mutation driving genetic diversity in dogs within the Chornobyl exclusion zone?

Affiliations

Is increased mutation driving genetic diversity in dogs within the Chornobyl exclusion zone?

Megan N Dillon et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Environmental contamination can have lasting impacts on surrounding communities, though the long-term impacts can be difficult to ascertain. The disaster at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1986 and subsequent remediation efforts resulted in contamination of the local environment with radioactive material, heavy metals, and additional environmental toxicants. Many of these are mutagenic in nature, and the full effect of these exposures on local flora and fauna has yet to be understood. Several hundred free-roaming dogs occupy the contaminated area surrounding the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant, and previous studies have highlighted a striking level of genetic differentiation between two geographically close populations of these dogs. With this work, we investigate mutation as a possible driver of this genetic differentiation. First, we consider large-scale mutation by assessing the karyotypic architecture of these dogs. We then search for evidence of mutation through short tandem repeat/microsatellite diversity analyses and by calculating the proportion of recently derived alleles in individuals in both populations. Through these analyses, we do not find evidence of differential mutation accumulation for these populations. Thus, we find no evidence that an increased mutation rate is driving the genetic differentiation between these two Chornobyl populations. The dog populations at Chornobyl present a unique opportunity for studying the genetic effects of the long-term exposures they have encountered, and this study expands and builds on previous work done in the area.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Derived allele analysis pipeline.
The analysis involves setting the basenjis as ancestor (Phase 1), counts and proportion calculations for each individual (Phase 2), and summary of the combinatorial pairings for the analysis (Phase 3). CC represents Chornobyl City, NPP represents the Nuclear Power Plant. A simplified representation of derived allele analysis at the single locus level is featured in the lower right, where the ancestor represented here is the basenji. In the derived allele analyses, we scan the genome for instances such as these, where either the PP individual shows evidence of the derived allele (left) or the CC individual contains the derived allele (right) when compared to the ancestor (basenji).
Fig 2
Fig 2. DAPI banded chromosomes of a lymphocyte from a free ranging female dog from the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant population.
This cell contains 76 autosomes and two X chromosomes, as expected from a domestic dog. (A) and (B) show a DAPI banded metaphase spread and associated karyotype, respectively, tinted to highlight chromosome pairs. (C) and (D) show the DAPI-banded metaphase spread and associated karyotype, respectively, with tinting removed to allow gross cytogenetic evaluation. All cells evaluated had no evidence of gross structural or numerical changes. Tinted metaphases and karyotypes were generated using SmartType v 3.4.12 (Digital Scientific, Cambridge, UK).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Genetic differentiation analyses for Chornobyl and Eastern European free-breeding dog populations.
(A) Pairwise FST measures between all five populations, color scales from low FST (white) to high FST (blue). All FST values are significant based on bootstrapping to 99% confidence interval. (B) Cluster analysis and subsequent discriminant analysis of principal components, where cluster two (blue) is entirely Nuclear Power Plant individuals and cluster one (gold) contains the other four groups.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Representative selection of allele frequency distributions for three loci.
Included here are (A) AHTk253, (B) CDH4, (C) VGL2409. Chornobyl City frequencies indicated in gold, Nuclear Power Plant in blue. More plots are available in S1 Fig.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Summary of derived allele proportions for all 25 possible pairs of Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) and Chornobyl City (CC) individuals for all three analyses.
These plots depict Replicate one and Replicate two, with basenji as the common ancestor, and the final trial with gray wolf serving as the ancestor. Box plots highlight lower quartile, median, and upper quartile, and the whiskers extend to the most extreme values but not further than 1.5 * inter-quartile range (IQR) from the hinge. Points indicate the true proportions taken for each comparison.

Similar articles

References

    1. Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, Adeyi O, Arnold R, Basu NN, et al.. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet. 2018;391(10119):462–512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodríguez-Eugenio N, McLaughlin M, Pennock D. Soil Pollution: A Hidden Reality. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2018. Available from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3f7e6959-db0b-4...
    1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Land and Emergency Management. Superfund site information from SEMS as of the end of FY2019 and site boundary data from FY 2014 FOIA Request and Population data from the 2015–2018 American Community Survey EPA; 2020. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/webpopulationr...
    1. Brown S, Chaney RL, Sprenger M, Compton H. Assessing impact to wildlife at biosolids remediated sites. BioCycle. 2002;43(8):50–8.
    1. Wu X, Cobbina SJ, Mao G, Xu H, Zhang Z, Yang L. A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016. May 1;23(9):8244–59. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources