Is increased mutation driving genetic diversity in dogs within the Chornobyl exclusion zone?
- PMID: 39729458
- PMCID: PMC11676578
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315244
Is increased mutation driving genetic diversity in dogs within the Chornobyl exclusion zone?
Abstract
Environmental contamination can have lasting impacts on surrounding communities, though the long-term impacts can be difficult to ascertain. The disaster at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1986 and subsequent remediation efforts resulted in contamination of the local environment with radioactive material, heavy metals, and additional environmental toxicants. Many of these are mutagenic in nature, and the full effect of these exposures on local flora and fauna has yet to be understood. Several hundred free-roaming dogs occupy the contaminated area surrounding the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant, and previous studies have highlighted a striking level of genetic differentiation between two geographically close populations of these dogs. With this work, we investigate mutation as a possible driver of this genetic differentiation. First, we consider large-scale mutation by assessing the karyotypic architecture of these dogs. We then search for evidence of mutation through short tandem repeat/microsatellite diversity analyses and by calculating the proportion of recently derived alleles in individuals in both populations. Through these analyses, we do not find evidence of differential mutation accumulation for these populations. Thus, we find no evidence that an increased mutation rate is driving the genetic differentiation between these two Chornobyl populations. The dog populations at Chornobyl present a unique opportunity for studying the genetic effects of the long-term exposures they have encountered, and this study expands and builds on previous work done in the area.
Copyright: © 2024 Dillon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Rodríguez-Eugenio N, McLaughlin M, Pennock D. Soil Pollution: A Hidden Reality. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2018. Available from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/3f7e6959-db0b-4...
-
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Land and Emergency Management. Superfund site information from SEMS as of the end of FY2019 and site boundary data from FY 2014 FOIA Request and Population data from the 2015–2018 American Community Survey EPA; 2020. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/webpopulationr...
-
- Brown S, Chaney RL, Sprenger M, Compton H. Assessing impact to wildlife at biosolids remediated sites. BioCycle. 2002;43(8):50–8.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
