Hysteroscopic metroplasty and its reproductive impact among the social networks: A cross-sectional analysis on video quality, reliability and creators' opinions on YouTube, TikTok and Instagram
- PMID: 39729920
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105776
Hysteroscopic metroplasty and its reproductive impact among the social networks: A cross-sectional analysis on video quality, reliability and creators' opinions on YouTube, TikTok and Instagram
Abstract
Background: Usefulness of hysteroscopic metroplasty to improve reproductive outcomes is controversial and debated among reproductive specialists and, consequently, patients.
Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis to assess the quality, reliability, and level of misinformation in YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok videos about hysteroscopic metroplasty. Videos on each social network retrieved using "hysteroscopy" and "septate uterus" or "uterine septum" as keywords were assessed using Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audio-visual (PEMAT A/V) content, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Global Quality Scale (GQS), Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI) and Misinformation assessment.
Results: One hundred fifteen videos (47 from YouTube, 35 from TikTok, and 33 from Instagram) were included. Median PEMAT A/V Understandability and Actionability scores were 50.0 % (IQR: 0-63.3) and 20 % (IQR: 0.0-50.0). Actionability was higher YouTube relative to TikTok and Instagram (50.0 % [IQR: 0-75.0] vs. 0 % [IQR: 0-66.0]; p < 0.001 and 0 % [IQR: 0-33.0], p < 0.001), with no significant differences for Understandability. Median mDISCERN was 3 (IQR: 0-3), with higher score for YouTube compared to TikTok and Instagram (3 [IQR: 0-3] vs. 0 [IQR: 0-23], p < 0.001 and 1 [IQR 0-3.0], p < 0.001 respectively). VIQI showed low-level content (median 9; IQR: 4-19) and no differences among social media platforms. GQS was low (median 2 [IQR 1-4.5]), with no differences in subgroup analysis. Videos on YouTube (97.9 %) and TikTok (62.9 %) favored hysteroscopic metroplasty, while Instagram content was against in 63.6 % of cases (p < 0.001). While most videos were found to be either completely or partially accurate, significant differences in misinformation levels were observed across platforms, with YouTube exhibiting the lowest rate of inaccuracies compared to TikTok and Instagram. (8.5 % vs. 42.9 % and 36.4 %; p < 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: Quality of social networks' videos on hysteroscopic metroplasty seems unsatisfactory, but with low levels of misinformation. YouTube and TikTok were more favorable than Instagram regarding the usefulness of metroplasty. In contrast, a favorable opinion regarding its efficacy in fertility improvement was retrieved in each social.
Keywords: Hysteroscopy; Infertility; Internet; Misinformation; Mullerian anomalies; Social media; Uterine septum.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Assessing quality, reliability and accuracy of polycystic ovary syndrome-related content on TikTok: A video-based cross-sectional analysis.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):274-283. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70007. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39927850 Free PMC article.
-
TikTok as a platform for hysteroscopy information: An analytical video-based cross-sectional study to assess quality, reliability, and accuracy.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;168(1):353-361. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15846. Epub 2024 Aug 9. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39118465 Free PMC article.
-
Quality and Dissemination of Uterine Fibroid Health Information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 1;9:e75120. doi: 10.2196/75120. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40749219 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the understandability, actionability and reliability of YouTube videos for brain, head, and neck cancer information.Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Jun;70:102605. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102605. Epub 2024 May 8. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38795450 Review.
-
A Review and Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos for Burn Education.J Burn Care Res. 2024 Jan 5;45(1):4-7. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irad150. J Burn Care Res. 2024. PMID: 37797268 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of intrauterine adhesion prevention among healthcare providers and patients: a cross-sectional study in western China.BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 9;25(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07273-w. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 40346573 Free PMC article.
-
Can the CANKADO online application improve quality of life monitoring via the endometriosis health profile-30 in endometriosis patients: A randomized cohort study on acceptance, usability, and correlations with demographics and media usage.BMC Womens Health. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03736-w. BMC Womens Health. 2025. PMID: 40296083 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic resection of uterine septum: does the size matter? a retrospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Aug 21;25(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07712-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025. PMID: 40841949 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing quality, reliability and accuracy of polycystic ovary syndrome-related content on TikTok: A video-based cross-sectional analysis.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;170(1):274-283. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70007. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39927850 Free PMC article.
-
The Quality and Reliability of Online Videos as an Information Source of Public Health Education for Stroke Prevention in Mainland China: Electronic Media-Based Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jul 21;5:e64891. doi: 10.2196/64891. JMIR Infodemiology. 2025. PMID: 40690658 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources