Enhancing translational medical research through proof-of-concept services: clinicians' perspectives
- PMID: 39730948
- PMCID: PMC11680784
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82401-y
Enhancing translational medical research through proof-of-concept services: clinicians' perspectives
Abstract
Although the proof-of-concept (POC) phase is critical for the success of translational medical research (TMR), its use remains limited, and clinicians are frequently uncertain about how to seek assistance from POC teams when experiencing difficulties with TMR. Therefore, this study explored clinicians' awareness of POC and the supportive reference services offered by POC teams. We distributed an internet-based questionnaire to 702 clinicians who conducted TMR between August 2022 and March 2023. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, and stepwise logistic regression analysis were applied. Clinicians' awareness of POC was low (69.23%). However, young clinicians (aged 21-30 years) with a higher educational level than their colleagues, good understanding of POC, reliance on the hospital's TMR policy and serviceability, and need or great need for services to identify suitable technology, literature, and intelligence services were likely to choose 'agree' over 'disagree' regarding the ability for POC services to help solve difficulties with TMR. Favourable conditions should be created to encourage clinicians to fully use POC services, and clinicians should actively acquire POC knowledge to enhance their understanding of the value of POC services in TMR. Notably, promoting the establishment of POC centres or platforms at the national level would facilitate the use of POC services by clinicians conducting TMR.
Keywords: Proof-of-concept; Translational medical research; Translational medicine; Translational research.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Committee on Ethics of Medicine, Navy Medical University, PLA. All participants were informed of the study aims and provided informed consent electronically. Consent for publication: Not applicable.
Similar articles
-
Collaborative relationships in translational medical research among Chinese clinicians: an internet-based cross-sectional survey.J Transl Med. 2021 Jun 5;19(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02911-5. J Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 34090449 Free PMC article.
-
Cognition of nursing translational medical research among nursing practitioners in China.J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr;75:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.12.020. Epub 2023 Dec 31. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38163421
-
Clinician perspectives on having point of care tests made available to them during out of hours home visiting.BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Dec 16;22(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01571-0. BMC Fam Pract. 2021. PMID: 34911451 Free PMC article.
-
Point-of-care Cognitive Support Technology in Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review of Technology Acceptance by Clinicians.Acad Emerg Med. 2018 May;25(5):494-507. doi: 10.1111/acem.13325. Epub 2017 Nov 8. Acad Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 28960689
-
Mapping review of 'proof-of-concept' in mental health implementation research using the TRL framework: a need for a better focus and conceptual clarification.BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 22;14(8):e080078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080078. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39179274 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Wehling, M. In Principles of Translational Science in Medicine (Third Edition) (ed Martin Wehling), pp 257–261 (Academic, 2021).
-
- Maia, C. & Claro, J. The role of a Proof of Concept Center in a university ecosystem: an exploratory study. J. Technol. Transf.38, 641–650 (2013).
-
- Sergey, A. B., Alexandr, D. B. & Sergey, A. T. Proof of concept center — a promising tool for innovative development at entrepreneurial universities. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.166, 240–245 (2015).
-
- Hayter, C. S. & Link, A. N. University Proof of Concept Centers: empowering faculty to capitalize on their research. Issues Sci. Technol.31, 32 (2015).
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources