Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata
- PMID: 39731627
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-06010-z
Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Robot‑Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata.Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jun;36(6):1339. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06188-w. Int Urogynecol J. 2025. PMID: 40498386 No abstract available.
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Autologous fascia lata has been increasingly utilised in pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries such as sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy. This case highlights sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata as a promising option for women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus and avoid synthetic mesh.
Methods: We report the case of a 65-year-old woman with stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse following one forceps and one spontaneous vaginal delivery. She presented with cervical-dominant prolapse (6 cm beyond the hymen) and a widened genital hiatus. She was initially managed with a Gellhorn pessary for 7 months, which was removed before surgery. Preoperative findings included prolapse of the cervix, anterior, and posterior vaginal walls (+ 1 cm distal to the hymen). A robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata was performed.
Results: The 120-min procedure, conducted by a certified urogynaecologist, began with harvesting a 12 × 4 cm autologous fascia lata graft from the left thigh. The graft site was closed with 2-0 absorbable sutures and supported with a compression bandage for 4 weeks. The graft was secured to the cervix and anterior longitudinal ligament through laparoscopic dissection and robot-assisted suturing. No perioperative complications occurred, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. At 1-year follow-up, there was no recurrence of prolapse.
Conclusions: Sacrohysteropexy using autologous fascia lata is a feasible and effective alternative to synthetic mesh, providing an additional surgical treatment option for women in settings where synthetic polypropylene meshes are not approved, contraindicated, or an unacceptable option.
Keywords: Apical prolapse; Fascia lata; Pelvic organ prolapse; Robotic surgery; Sacrocolpopexy; Sacrohysteropexy.
© 2024. The International Urogynecological Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of Interest: None. Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this video article.
Similar articles
-
Medium Term Outcomes for Robotic Sacral Colpopexy With Autologous Fascia Lata.Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Aug;44(6):1339-1343. doi: 10.1002/nau.70094. Epub 2025 Jun 27. Neurourol Urodyn. 2025. PMID: 40575932 Free PMC article.
-
Medium-Term Outcomes of Total Autologous Fascia Lata Anterior and Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair.Neurourol Urodyn. 2025 Jun;44(5):1163-1169. doi: 10.1002/nau.70042. Epub 2025 Mar 26. Neurourol Urodyn. 2025. PMID: 40135818
-
Robotic Sacrohysteropexy With Concurrent Rectopexy using Fascia Lata Graft.Urology. 2023 Mar;173:228. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.015. Epub 2022 Dec 25. Urology. 2023. PMID: 36577453
-
Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.Minerva Ginecol. 2019 Feb;71(1):4-17. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04331-9. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Minerva Ginecol. 2019. PMID: 30318878 Review.
-
Sacrocolpopexy: Alternatives to Mesh Grafts.Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan;36(1):3-10. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05956-4. Epub 2024 Oct 30. Int Urogynecol J. 2025. PMID: 39476292 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical