Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jul;41(7):2283-2293.
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.12.023. Epub 2024 Dec 26.

Sling Is Not Inferior to Brace Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Sling Is Not Inferior to Brace Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Florian Schönweger et al. Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of immobilizing the upper limb with a brace versus a less-constrained sling in the rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), by documenting clinical and radiologic results.

Methods: ARCR was performed in 110 patients (54.9 ± 8.3 years) randomized in group A, using a brace for 6 weeks after surgery (3 weeks day and night then 3 weeks only at night), and group B, using a simple sling for 2 weeks only. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 and 6 months. Functional outcomes were range of motion, strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale and quality of life with the SF-36 questionnaire. The primary outcome was the CMS at 6 months. At 6 months, 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging was performed to document the status of the rotator cuff repair. The minimal clinically important difference was also analyzed.

Results: Both groups A and B showed a worsening at 6 weeks and an improvement at 3 and 6 months of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and CMS, as well as a significant visual analog scale decrease at every follow-up (P < .005). SF-36 showed a different trend: General health improved at 6 weeks, then decreased at 3 months, and increased again at 6 months. No difference was retrieved between the 2 groups at any follow-up in terms of pain, functional, and general health scores. The minimal clinically important difference for the primary outcome was 14.5 points and was reached in 56.5% and 61.2% of patients in the sling and brace group, respectively. The evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging scans identified 5 patients in each group with a supraspinatus tendon re-rupture, with no statistical difference in the re-rupture rate between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that ARCR postoperative sling immobilization was not inferior to immobilization with a brace, having no differences in terms of functional scores, pain levels, general health, and risk of tendon re-rupture.

Level of evidence: Level I, high-quality randomized controlled trial (designed as a therapeutic study investigating the results of treatment) with statistically significant difference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: C.C. has received institutional support outside the present work from Medacta International SA, Johnson & Johnson, Lima Corporate, Zimmer Biomet, and Oped AG. All other authors (F.S., F.M., P.F., S.R.M., G.F.) declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Publication types