Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Dec 27;14(12):e086937.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086937.

Quality of care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: a cross-sectional study based on WHO standards

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Quality of care at childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: a cross-sectional study based on WHO standards

Anna Galle et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To examine quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around childbirth in facilities in Belgium during the COVID-19 pandemic and trends over time.

Design: A cross-sectional observational study.

Setting: Data of the Improving MAternal Newborn carE in the EURO region study in Belgium.

Participants: Women giving birth in a Belgian facility from 1 March 2020 to 1 May 2023 responded a validated online questionnaire based on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures organised in four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of resources and organisational changes related to COVID-19.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Quantile regression analysis was performed to assess predictors of QMNC; trends over time were tested with the Mann-Kendall test.

Results: 897 women were included in the analysis, 67% (n=601) with spontaneous vaginal birth, 13.3% (n=119) with instrumental vaginal birth (IVB) and 19.7% (n=177) with caesarean section. We found overall high QMNC scores (median index scores>75) but also specific gaps in all domains of QMNC. On provision of care, 21.0% (n=166) of women who experienced labour reported inadequate pain relief, 64.7% (n=74) of women with an instrumental birth reported fundal pressure and 72.3% (n=86) reported that forceps or vacuum cup was used without their consent. On experience of care, 31.1% (n=279) reported unclear communication, 32.9% (n=295) reported that they were not involved in choices,11.5% (n=104) stated not being treated with dignity and 8.1% (n=73) experienced abuse. Related to resources, almost half of the women reported an inadequate number of healthcare professionals (46.2%, n=414). Multivariable analyses showed significantly lower QMNC scores for women with an IVB (-20.4 in the 50th percentile with p<0.001 and 95% CI (-25.2 to -15.5)). Over time, there was a significant increase in QMNC Score for 'experience of care' and 'key organisational changes due to COVID-19' (trend test p< 0.05).

Conclusions and relevance: Our study showed several gaps in QMNC in Belgium, underlying causes of these gaps should be explored to design appropriate interventions and policies.

Trial registration number: NCT04847336.

Keywords: Maternal medicine; Midwifery; PUBLIC HEALTH; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study sample of women. IMAgiNE EURO, Improving MAternal Newborn carE in the EURO region.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Lineplot showing the experiences of care and reorganisational changes due to COVID-19 indexes by study trimester. Figure shows the median (full line) and IQR (dotted line); the p values are obtained with Mann‐Kendall test for monotonic trend (H0: no monotonic trend).

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization WHO recommendations. intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. :200. - PubMed
    1. Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, et al. Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. The Lancet. 2016;388:2176–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31472-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Seijmonsbergen-Schermers AE, van den Akker T, Rydahl E, et al. Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maaløe N, Kujabi ML, Nathan NO, et al. Inconsistent definitions of labour progress and over-medicalisation cause unnecessary harm during birth. BMJ. 2023;383:e076515. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076515. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lazzerini M, Covi B, Mariani I, et al. Quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey investigating maternal perspectives in 12 countries of the WHO European Region. Lancet Reg Health Eur . 2022;13:100268. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100268. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data