Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31244.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82631-0.

Decoding of pain during heel lancing in human neonates with EEG signal and machine learning approach

Affiliations

Decoding of pain during heel lancing in human neonates with EEG signal and machine learning approach

Reyhane Shafiee et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Currently, pain assessment using electroencephalogram signals and machine learning methods in clinical studies is of great importance, especially for those who cannot express their pain. Since newborns are among the high-risk group and always experience pain at the beginning of birth, in this research, the severity of newborns has been investigated and evaluated. Other studies related to the annoyance of newborns have used the EEG signal of newborns alone; therefore, in this study, the intensity of newborn pain was measured using the electroencephalogram signal of 107 infants who were stimulated by the heel lance in three levels: no pain, low pain and moderate pain were recorded as a single trial and evaluated. The support vector machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Ensemble bagging classifiers were trained using the K-fold cross-validation method and features of the brain's time-frequency domain. The results were obtained with accuracies of 72.8 ± 2, 84.4 ± 1.3 and 82.9 ± 1.6%, respectively. Also, in examining the problem of distinguishing pain and no pain, the electroencephalogram signal of 74 infants was evaluated, and similar to the three-class mode, with the 10-fold validation method, we reached the highest accuracy of 100% in Bagging classifier and 98.6 ± 0.1 accuracy in KNN and SVM classifiers.

Keywords: EEG signals; Human neonates; Pain Decoding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the electroencephalography (EEG) analysis strategy for pain decoding.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Neonatal EEG signal recorded over 4 s; (a) with pain, (b) without pain.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Extracting electroencephalography (EEG) features using discrete wavelet transform (DWT) with the mother wavelet sym8 and level 8.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Choosing best mother wavelet with estimating SVM classifier.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Average Confusion matrix for (a) two-class (1: no pain, 2: pain), (b) three-class (1: no pain, 2: low pain, 3: moderate pain).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Classification performance for each frequency band (delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma).

Similar articles

References

    1. Merskey, H. et al. Editorial: the need of a taxonomy. Pain6 (3), 247–252 (1979). - PubMed
    1. Simons, S. H. P. et al. Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med.157 (11), 1058–1064 (2003). - PubMed
    1. Craig, K. D., Whitfield, M. F., Grunau, R. V. E., Linton, J. & Hadjistavropoulos, H. D. Pain in the preterm neonate: behavioural and physiological indices. Pain52 (3), 287–299 (1993). - PubMed
    1. van der Vaart, M. L. Multimodal Assessment of Neonatal pain (University of Oxford, 2022).
    1. Smith, R. P., Gitau, R., Glover, V. & Fisk, N. M. Pain and stress in the human fetus. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.92 (1), 161–165 (2000). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources