From evidence to advice in France, Germany, and the UK: transparency, accountability, and participation in pandemic science advice
- PMID: 39733088
- DOI: 10.1057/s41271-024-00544-8
From evidence to advice in France, Germany, and the UK: transparency, accountability, and participation in pandemic science advice
Abstract
Politicians often claim to be "following science" but their claims are, reasonably, disputed. To claim to be following the science can mean that scientific evidence affects or legitimates decisions. The evidence that politicians are following science often comes from formal systems of advice that translate science into advice. We study the systems that informed policy in France, Germany, and the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found that while in all three countries politicians had incentive to prefer private advice tailored to their needs, more transparent and independent advice appeared to contribute more to good policymaking and implementation, including by enhancing government's current and future accountability for their decisions.
Keywords: COVID-19; France; Germany; Scientific advice; United Kingdom.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Jasanoff S. Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Prince University Press. 2007. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691130422/designs-on-nature . Accessed 7 Nov 2021.
-
- da Silva RGL, Chammas R, Novaes HMD. Rethinking approaches of science, technology, and innovation in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: the challenge of translating knowledge infrastructures to public needs. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1):104. - DOI
-
- Unruh L, Allin S, Marchildon G, Burke S, Barry S, Siersbaek R, et al. A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Health Policy. 2022;126(5):427–37. - DOI
-
- Brubacher LJ, Lovato CY, Sriram V, Cheng M, Berman P. The use of evidence to guide decision-making during the COVID-19 pandemic: divergent perspectives from a qualitative case study in British Columbia, Canada. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2564918/latest
-
- Bekker M, van Egmond S, Wehrens R, Putters K, Bal R. Linking research and policy in Dutch healthcare: infrastructure, innovations and impacts. Evidence & Policy. 2010;6(2):237–53. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical