Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Dec 20:2024:8871568.
doi: 10.1155/prm/8871568. eCollection 2024.

Lumbar Facet Joint Radiofrequency Ablation With a 3-Tined Cannula: A Technical Report and Observational Study

Andrea Künzle  1   2 , Sander M J van Kuijk  2   3 , Eva Koetsier  1   2
Affiliations
Observational Study

Lumbar Facet Joint Radiofrequency Ablation With a 3-Tined Cannula: A Technical Report and Observational Study

Andrea Künzle et al. Pain Res Manag. .

Abstract

Background: Lumbar facet joints are the source of pain in 15%-41% of individuals experiencing low back pain (LBP). Conventional lumbar facet radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has Level II evidence for improving pain and function. The best proven technique, the parallel technique, is technically challenging, time-consuming, and often uncomfortable for the patient. A novel RFA technique using a 3-tined cannula offers a potentially less complex and shorter procedure. Objectives: To describe the novel lumbar facet joint RFA technique with the 3-tined cannula and to evaluate its efficacy in treating chronic lumbar facet joint pain. Methods: Eligible adult patients with chronic lumbar facet joint pain, confirmed by positive medial branch blocks (MBBs), refractory to conservative treatment, received the novel RFA treatment with the 3-tined cannula. The change in pain intensity at 2 months follow-up compared to baseline, percentage of patients reporting a ≥ 30% and ≥ 50% reduction of pain intensity, patient global impression of change (PGIC), need for pain medication, walking ability, sleep quality, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Results: A total of 44 patients were included. Patients experienced a clinically meaningful and significant pain relief at follow-up and 41% of the patients reported ≥ 50% reduction of pain. Forty-eight percent experienced at least a score of "much improved" on the PGIC. No severe side effects or complications were observed. Conclusions: Our observational study suggests that lumbar facet joint RFA using the novel technique achieves significant pain relief. The larger lesions decrease the likelihood of missing the target nerve while obviating the need to conduct numerous lesions. Limiting is the single-center set-up with a relatively short-term follow-up duration. Randomized controlled clinical trials are warranted to confirm the efficacy of the novel RFA technique to treat lumbar facet joint pain.

Keywords: ablation; denervation; facet joint pain; low back pain; lumbar; multitined cannula; observational study; perpendicular approach; radiofrequency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
18-gauge 3-tined RFA cannula with a 5-mm active tip with the 3 tines deployed, separated by 120°. Tine deployment is achieved by rotation of the gray collar on the hub of the cannula. RFA = radiofrequency ablation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fluoroscopic image demonstrating the positioning of the cannula with the 3 tines deployed and targeted at the level of the left L3 medial branch nerve. The oblique view (a), the lateral view (b), and anteroposterior view (c) are shown. RFA = radiofrequency ablation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient enrollment flowchart.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Change in pain intensity from pre- to post-RFA. NRS = numeric rating scale, RFA = radiofrequency ablation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
PGIC scores 2 months after RFA in percentage of patients. PGIC = global impression of change, RFA = radiofrequency ablation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Manchikanti L., Kaye A. D., Soin A., et al. Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines for Facet Joint Interventions in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines Facet Joint Interventions 2020 Guidelines. Pain Physician . 2020;23(3S):S1–S127. - PubMed
    1. Curtis L., Shah N., Padalia D. Facet Joint Disease . Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. - PubMed
    1. Vos T., Flaxman A. D., Naghavi M., et al. Years Lived with Disability (YLDs) for 1160 Sequelae of 289 Diseases and Injuries 1990–2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet . 2012;380(9859):2163–2196. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61729-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geurts J. W., Willems P. C., Kallewaard J.-W., van Kleef M., Dirksen C. The Impact of Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: Costs and Patients’ Burden. Pain Research and Management . 2018;2018:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2018/4696180. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gómez Vega J. C., Acevedo-González J. C. Clinical Diagnosis Scale for Pain Lumbar of Facet Origin: Systematic Review of Literature and Pilot Study. Neurocirugia . 2019;30(3):133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.neucie.2018.07.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources