Editorial: Paradoxes of diversity, equity and inclusion: from the lab to the social field
- PMID: 39734769
- PMCID: PMC11672209
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1511223
Editorial: Paradoxes of diversity, equity and inclusion: from the lab to the social field
Keywords: continuum; diversity; diversity ideologies; equity; inclusion; paradoxes; policies.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Comment on
- Editorial on the Research Topic Paradoxes of diversity, equity and inclusion: from the lab to the social field
References
-
- Boroş S. (2022). Reviving the stalled revolution of the working mother: Multi-level intervention paths towards more gender balance. J. Commun. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32, 721–727. 10.1002/casp.2591 - DOI
-
- De Cock V., Celik P., Toma C. (2024). The proof is in the pudding: workers care about evidence-based diversity cues, not about value-based diversity cues. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.
-
- Konadu-Osei O. A., Boroş S., Bosch A. (2023). Methodological decolonisation and local epistemologies in business ethics research. J. Bus. Ethics 186, 1–12. 10.1007/s10551-022-05220-z - DOI
-
- Post C., Muzio D., Sarala R., Wei L., Faems D. (2021). Theorizing diversity in management studies: new perspectives and future directions. J. Manag. Stud. 58, 2003–2023. 10.1111/joms.12779 - DOI
-
- Roberson Q., Scott W. (2024). Contributive justice: An invisible barrier to workplace inclusion. J. Manag. 50, 877–897. 10.1177/01492063221116089 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
