No decision about me, without me: Collaborating with young people in mental health research
- PMID: 39734923
- PMCID: PMC11669772
- DOI: 10.1002/jcv2.12291
No decision about me, without me: Collaborating with young people in mental health research
Abstract
Involving young people with lived experience in youth mental health research is important. In recognition of the value of collaborating with experts by experience, international funders are increasingly mandating that mental health research is developed by teams that include individuals from the population of study. Yet, research into how Patient Public Involvement, specifically co-production and co-design, is implemented in youth mental health research is limited to date. The current review examined this question and identified common practices for collaborating with experts by experience in young people's mental health research. Academic databases were systematically searched for studies that had involved young people in mental health research, had described these activities, and had reported some demographic information about the experts by experience. From a total of 2130 studies that were screened, 37 studies were eligible for inclusion. The use of co-production and co-design spanned a wide range of topics, including interventions, digital support tools and psychometric studies. Interactive workshops were the primary method of engaging experts by experience, although some studies utilised interviews or focus groups. From the reviewed studies we identified common methodological practices including: Scene setting, utilising a cyclical process, ensuring appropriate engagement and recognition of the cultural context. We draw on these findings to suggest common methods for conducting co-production and co-design activities, and emphasise the importance of ensuring experts by experience are respected and safeguarded throughout their collaboration in research. We also outline areas that deserve future attention and development, and include a response from two young people aged 16-18 and their suggestions for improving and extending co-production methods.
Keywords: PPI; co‐design; co‐production; developmental psychopathology; participatory research.
© 2024 The Author(s). JCPP Advances published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that they have no competing or potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Co-production of accessible digital mental health supports with marginalised young people: a scoping review.J Ment Health. 2025 Jun 2:1-18. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2025.2512317. Online ahead of print. J Ment Health. 2025. PMID: 40455811 Review.
-
Factors that affect clinical youth engagement in digital mental health research: a qualitative sub-study nested within a prospective cohort study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02571-9. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025. PMID: 40307751 Free PMC article.
-
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5. Res Involv Engagem. 2023. PMID: 37828630 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Actualizing community-academic partnerships in research: a case study on rural perinatal peer support.Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 18;8(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00407-0. Res Involv Engagem. 2022. PMID: 36529798 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abel, K. M. , Bee, P. , Gega, L. , Gellatly, J. , Kolade, A. , Hunter, D. , Carter, L. A. , Meacock, R. , Bower, P. , Stanley, N. , Calam, R. , Wolpert, M. , Stewart, P. , Emsley, R. , Holt, K. , Linklater, H. , Douglas, S. , Stokes‐Crossley, B. , & Green, J. (2020). An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: The young SMILES feasibility RCT. Health Technology Assessment, 24(59), 1–136. 10.3310/hta24590 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- American Psychological Association . (2020). Publication manual of the American psychological association (7th ed.). 10.1037/0000165-000 - DOI
-
- Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. 10.1080/01944366908977225 - DOI
-
- Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J. , & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2024). Anything goes for participant, patient and public involvement in youth mental health research. JCPP Advances, e12258. 10.1002/jcv2.12258 - DOI
-
- Bennett, V. , Gill, C. , Miller, P. , Lewis, P. , Ypag, N. , Hamilton‐Giachritsis, C. , & Lavi, I. (2022b). Developing a novel co‐produced methodology to understand ‘real‐world’help‐seeking in online peer–peer communities by young people experiencing emotional abuse and neglect. Health Expectations, 25(6), 3124–3142. 10.1111/hex.13621 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources