Evidence-Based Strategies to Minimize Unnecessary Primary Cesarean Sections: A Comprehensive Review

Abstract

The increase in cesarean section (CS) rates, whether they are classified as unnecessary or elective, has globally raised significant concerns due to the associated risks involving maternal and neonatal outcomes. Although CS can be a lifesaving operation in specific medical cases, its overuse is exposing mothers and neonates to complications like hemorrhage, infections, and long-term consequences such as uterine scarring, infertility, and future pregnancy problems. The contributing factors include maternal preferences for convenience, fear of labor, and financial incentives within the healthcare systems that favor surgical interventions. Defensive medical practices and private healthcare providers further exacerbate this trend. This review discusses the prevalence of CS, highlighting variations between developing and developed regions and the complexity of addressing the rising rates. Moreover, recommendations to reduce unnecessary CS, such as enhancing antenatal education to inform mothers about the risks and benefits associated with different delivery options, promoting supportive care models (midwives), and fostering interdisciplinary cooperation among healthcare providers, will also be addressed. Healthcare systems will gain the ability to reduce the rates of unnecessary Cesarean procedures by directing the main focus on patient education, continuous monitoring, and policy reforms. This will lead to the improvement of both neonatal and maternal health outcomes in addition to lowering the costs of healthcare. In order to provide and ensure evidence-based and safe care for childbirth, a multidisciplinary approach is essential.

Keywords: cesarean section (cs); complications; cs rates; maternal and neonatal outcome; unnecessary.