Establishing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in a Developing Country: A Five-Year Experience at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Pakistan
- PMID: 39735052
- PMCID: PMC11681801
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74659
Establishing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in a Developing Country: A Five-Year Experience at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Pakistan
Abstract
Background The adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has increased over the past 25 to 30 years, driven by advancements in technology and a growing understanding of its benefits. This study evaluates the outcomes of 144 elective MICS procedures performed between January 2019 and September 2024. Methods Patients underwent various surgical approaches, including upper mini-sternotomy, mini-thoracotomy, and sub-xiphoid access. Patient demographics, preoperative characteristics, and surgical outcomes were analyzed. A total of 144 MICS procedures were performed. Results The cohort had a mean age of 30.72 years, with a nearly equal gender distribution, indicating that MICS can be performed safely in Pakistani patients. The mean ejection fraction was 53.58%, with hypertension being the most common comorbidity (22.2%). Aortic cannulation was primarily utilized, and aortic valve replacement (AVR) was the most common procedure (44.4%). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 95.9 ± 56.3 minutes and the mean aortic cross-clamp time was 62.22 ± 57.004 minutes, demonstrating efficient procedural times. The overall incidence of complications was low, supporting the safety and efficacy of MICS. Conclusion Our findings suggest that MICS is a viable and effective approach for a diverse patient population, with favorable clinical outcomes. The results underscore the potential for MICS to become standard practice in cardiothoracic surgery. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes and the influence of comorbidities to further enhance MICS methodologies.
Keywords: mini-sternotomy; minimal invasive cardiac surgery; minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass; surgical outcomes; thoracotomy.
Copyright © 2024, Aasim et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery and Single Vessel Coronary Artery Bypass via Limited Anterior Right Thoracotomy.Heart Surg Forum. 2015 Dec 21;18(6):E266-70. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1319. Heart Surg Forum. 2015. PMID: 26726719
-
Benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement with a mini upper sternotomy.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 26;15(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01268-y. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32847577 Free PMC article.
-
Experience with a minimally invasive approach to combined valve surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting through bilateral thoracotomies.Heart Surg Forum. 2013 Jun;16(3):E125-31. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20121126. Heart Surg Forum. 2013. PMID: 23803234
-
The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives.Future Cardiol. 2011 May;7(3):333-46. doi: 10.2217/fca.11.23. Future Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21627475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery( MICS) through a Mini-right Thoracotomy].Kyobu Geka. 2015 Jan;68(1):11-5. Kyobu Geka. 2015. PMID: 25595155 Review. Japanese.
References
-
- Current status and future directions of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Goldstein DJ, Oz MC. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1999;14:419–425. - PubMed
-
- Future of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Maehara T. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11797605/ Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;7:259–260. - PubMed
-
- Minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Mack MJ. Surg Endosc. 2006;20 Suppl 2:0–92. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous