Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):551.
doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03716-4.

Effects of saffron-grape intercropping on saffron flower number and rhizosphere microbial community

Affiliations

Effects of saffron-grape intercropping on saffron flower number and rhizosphere microbial community

Yuanyuan Tao et al. BMC Microbiol. .

Abstract

Background: Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) is a valuable herb. With the increasing demand for saffron, people are starting to focus on how to increase its yields. Intercropping and microbial interactions have a positive effect on plant yield, including enhanced soil fertility, enriched microbial diversity, reduced pest and disease incidences, and improved plant growth. However, the impact of intercropping saffron with other plants on saffron yields and soil microbial community diversity remains unclear. In our study, we counted the number of saffron flowers in two cropping patterns (saffron monoculture and saffron-grape intercropping), and analyzed the microbial community diversity and composition using Illumina high-throughput sequencing methods based on 16 S and ITS amplicons.

Results: The results showed that saffron-grape intercropping significantly increased number of flowers compared to saffron monoculture (P < 0.01). Saffron-grape intercropping influenced rhizosphere soil chemical properties and altered rhizosphere microbial communities. The pH of intercropped rhizosphere soil increased significantly from 5.84 to 6.43. Spearman's correlation revealed a significantly positive correlation between pH and Bacillus, Sphingomonas, Sphingobacterium, Halomonas, Pseudolabrys, and Dongia. Conversely, it showed a significant negative correlation with Pedobacter, Achromobacter, Tumebacillus, and Sphingopyxis in bacteria. In fungi, a significant negative correlation was observed. Although there was no significant difference in diversity, intercropping increased the observed richness and biodiversity of both bacteria and fungi compared to monoculture. The intercropping led to a higher relative abundance of bacterial genera such as Sphingomonas and Streptomyces, as well as fungal genera including Acremonium, Llyonectria, Penicillium, Cadophora, Plectosphaerella, and Tetracladium. Intercropping decreased the dominance of certain microbial taxa, including Fictibacillus, Microbacterium, and Glutamicibacter among bacterial genera, as well as Fusarium and Arthrographis among fungal genera. Additionally, functional analysis revealed that intercropping was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than monoculture in dark hydrogen oxidation, denitrification, nitrate denitrification, nitrous oxide denitrification, nitrite denitrification, and manganese oxidation. Plant pathogens decreased from 6.13% in monoculture to 2.46% in intercropping.

Conclusion: This study found that saffron-grape intercropping positively affected saffron yield. Based on the existing data, intercropping resulted in an increase in microbial communities, including some taxa previously identified as beneficial for other plants. These findings establish the foundation for the widespread application of saffron-grape intercropping and offer a promising strategy for increasing saffron yield.

Keywords: Flower number; Functional prediction; Microbial community; Rhizosphere soil; Saffron-grape intercropping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Statement: The sampling was conducted in holder farmer land and permission has been obtained from them to sample at this land.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Layout diagram of field experiments in cropping patterns. (A). Saffron-grape intercropping. (B). Detail view for saffron-grape intercropping. (C) Saffron monoculture. (D). Detail view for saffron monoculture
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Characteristics and quantity of saffron blossoms in intercropping. (A) Normal flowering in November. (B) Flowering growth status. (C) Root growth status. (D) Maximum quantity of flowers. (E) Lateral buds flower formation (Red Rectangle Marker). (F) Quantity of flowers in saffron-grape intercropping and saffron monoculture
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) OTUs of rhizosphere soil bacteria. (B) OTUs of rhizosphere soil fungi in saffron monoculture and saffron grape intercropping
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Diversity of the rhizosphere soil bacterial community between saffron grape intercropping and saffron monoculture. (A) Sobs index. (B) Shannon index. (C) Ace index. (D) PCoA analysis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Diversity of the rhizosphere soil fungal community between saffron grape intercropping and saffron monoculture. (A) Sobs index. (B) Shannon index. (C) Ace index. (D) PCoA analysis
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Relative abundance of the dominant microbiota of saffron-grape intercropping and saffron monoculture. (A) Relative abundance of bacteria at phylum level. (B) Relative abundance of bacteria at genus level. (C) Relative abundance of fungi at phylum level. (D) Relative abundance of fungi at genus level
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Function prediction of bacteria in intercropping and monoculture
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Function prediction of fungi in intercropping and monoculture
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Spearman’s correlation of rhizosphere soil microorganisms (top 50 in relative abundance) with pH. (A) Spearman’s correlation of bacterial microorganisms with pH. (B) Spearman’s correlation of fungal microorganisms with pH

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Melnyk JP, Wang S, Marcone MF. Chemical and biological properties of the world’s most expensive spice: saffron. Food Res Int. 2010;43(8):1981–9.
    1. Bayat M, Rahimi M, Ramezani M. Determining the most effective traits to improve saffron (Crocus sativus L.) yield. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2016;22(1):153–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta V, Sharma A, Rai PK, Gupta SK, Singh B, Sharma SK et al. Corm rot of saffron: epidemiology and management. Agronomy. 2021.
    1. Kafi M, Kamili AN, Husaini AM, Ozturk M, Altay V. An expensive spice saffron (Crocus sativus L.): a case study from Kashmir, Iran, and Turkey. Global perspectives on underutilized crops. 2018:109–49.
    1. Kothari D, Thakur R, Kumar R. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.): gold of the spices—a comprehensive review. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2021;62(5):661–77.

LinkOut - more resources