Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 30;12(6):qfae084.
doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfae084. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Analysis of the International Index of Erectile Function: psychometric evidence and measurement invariance across relationship status and age generations in a Chilean sample

Gonzalo R Quintana  1 , Fernando P Ponce  2 , Javier Escudero-Pastén  1 , J Francisco Santibáñez-Palma  1 , Carolina P Aguayo-Zuñiga  3 , Mercedes Carrasco-Portiño  4   5 , Marcela Cid-Aguayo  4 , Mauricio González-Arias  6 , Paola Ilabaca  7 , Rodrigo Jarpa-Schäcker  8 , Claudio López-Labarca  3 , Marco A Marrodán  9 , Nadia Ramos  10   11 , Leonardo Reyes-Torres  3 , Valeria Rosales-Pincetti  12   13 , María T Solis-Soto  14 , Anna Wlodarczyk  15 , Jaime Barrientos  16
Affiliations

Analysis of the International Index of Erectile Function: psychometric evidence and measurement invariance across relationship status and age generations in a Chilean sample

Gonzalo R Quintana et al. Sex Med. .

Abstract

Background: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) stands out for its utility and widespread use to measure sexual function in men. However, it lacks consistency in its internal latent structure across studies, has not been evaluated for measurement invariance, and has not undergone psychometric validation for its 15-item form in Spanish among South American countries.

Aim: To examine the IIEF's psychometric evidence (ie, structural/criterion validity and reliability) in a sample of adult men and determine its measurement invariance across relationship status (single vs in a relationship) and age generations (generations Z, Y/millennials, and X).

Methods: A sample of 650 sexually active males was derived from a broader Chilean study (Chilean Sex and Sexuality Study). We used a confirmatory factor analysis to determine the IIEF's structural validity, sexual satisfaction dimensions to establish its criterion-related validity, and Cronbach alpha and McDonald omega to assess the reliability of its scores.

Outcomes: Measures of goodness of fit.

Results: The evidence supported the 5-factor latent solution. Meanwhile, criterion-related validity revealed subtle yet significant differences in sexual satisfaction, with younger men displaying higher satisfaction in various sexual domains. In contrast, middle-aged men and those in a relationship showed better sexual function. Finally, the IIEF was invariant across age groups and relationship status at the factor covariance level.

Clinical translation: This study provides evidence that the IIEF is a valid, reliable, and invariant tool for the clinical practice in men's sexual health, particularly that associated with their sexual function and dysfunction.

Strengths and limitations: The study included a comprehensive validity analysis of the IIEF's psychometric properties, demonstrating its reliability and validity across diverse Chilean male subpopulations. The study also offered the IIEF's first assessment of measurement invariance and confirmed its suitability for clinical and research use in the Chilean population. Meanwhile, the study's limitations include a lack of clinical population and a sample predominantly younger, cisgender, and heterosexual.

Conclusion: Our study provides evidence of the IIEF's 5-factor structure and measurement invariance across age generations and relationship status in Chilean men, supporting its validity for clinical use and research and broadening its applicability in global sexual health studies, particularly in the Spanish-speaking South American male population.

Keywords: CSSS; Chile; erectile dysfunction; measurement invariance; psychometrics; sexual satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Five-factor confirmatory factor solution.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fielder R. Sexual functioning. In: Gellman MD, Turner JR, eds. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. Springer; 2013:1774–1777.
    1. Althof SE, Buvat J, Gutkin SW, Belger M, Stothard DR, Fugl-Meyer AR. Sexual satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction: correlates and potential predictors. J Sex Med. 2010;7(1, pt 1):203–215. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01554.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sánchez-Cruz JJ, Cabrera-León A, Martín-Morales A, Fernández A, Burgos R, Rejas J. Male erectile dysfunction and health-related quality of life. Eur Urol. 2003;44(2):245–253. 10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00215-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Publishing. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
    1. Elterman DS, Bhattacharyya SK, Mafilios M, Woodward E, Nitschelm K, Burnett AL. The quality of life and economic burden of erectile dysfunction. Res Rep Urol. 2021;13:79–86. 10.2147/RRU.S283097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources