Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;23(1):14-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2024.12.001. Epub 2024 Dec 6.

Neural correlates of basketball proficiency: An MRI study across skill levels

Affiliations

Neural correlates of basketball proficiency: An MRI study across skill levels

Manqi Zhang et al. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2025 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Basketball is an attractive sport required both cooperative and antagonistic motor skills. However, the neural mechanism of basketball proficiency remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the brain functional and structural substrates underlying varying levels of basketball capacity.

Methods: Twenty advanced basketball athletes (AB), 20 intermediate basketball athletes (IB) and 20 age-matched non-athlete individuals without basketball experience (NI) participated in this study and underwent T1-weighted MRI and resting-state fMRI scanning. Voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity (VMHC), amplitude of low frequency fluctuations (ALFF), and gray matter (GM) density were calculated and compared among the three groups.

Results: The VMHC in the bilateral postcentral gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, and superior temporal gyrus, as well as the GM density in the right precentral gyrus, exhibited a hierarchical structure of AB > IB > NI. Compared with NI group, AB and IB groups showed strengthened VMHC in supplementary motor area, paracentral lobule and superior frontal gyrus. Additionally, the ALFF of left middle occipital gyrus and right hippocampal and the GM density of left medial superior frontal gyrus exhibited differences in AB-IB and AB-NI comparisons.

Conclusions: By conducting the cross-sectional comparison, this study firstly identifies the varying levels of basketball proficiency related brain resting-state functional and structural plasticity. Especially, the regions associated with motor perception and control, including bilateral postcentral gyrus, middle and superior temporal gyrus and right precentral gyrus, are involved in the key neural mechanisms of basketball proficiency. Future longitudinal studies are necessary to further validate these findings.

Keywords: Basketball athletes; Basketball capacity; Brain plasticity; Brain training; MRI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have reported no financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Between-group Differences in ALFF. Warm color bars indicate regions with increased ALFF values, whereas cool color bars indicate regions with decreased ALFF values. AB: Advanced basketball athletes; IB: Intermediate basketball athletes; NI: Non-athlete individuals; ANG: angular gyrus; HIP: hippocampal gyrus; MOG: middle occipital gyrus; PHG: parahippocampal gyrus; L: left; R: right. The threshold of statistical significance was set at voxel-wise p < 0.001 (uncorrected) and cluster-wise p < 0.05 (FWE-corrected).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Brain regions with increased GM density in pairwise comparisons among AB, IB, and NI. The color bar scale indicates lower values trending towards black, and higher values trending towards the opposite end. AB: Advanced basketball athletes; IB: Intermediate basketball athletes; NI: Non-athlete individuals; SFGmed: medial superior frontal gyrus; PreCG: precentral gyrus; L: left; R: right. The threshold of statistical significance was set at voxel-wise p < 0.001 (uncorrected) and cluster-wise p < 0.05 (FWE-corrected).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bu X. Exploration of intelligent coaching systems: the application of artificial intelligence in basketball training. Saudi J Humanit Soc Sci. 2023;8(9):290–295. doi: 10.36348/sjhss.2023.v08i09.007. - DOI
    1. Zentgraf K., Musculus L., Reichert L., et al. Advocating individual-based profiles of elite athletes to capture the multifactorial nature of elite sports performance. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76977-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burger J., Henze A.S., Voit T., Latzel R., Moser O. Athlete monitoring systems in elite men's basketball: challenges, recommendations, and future perspectives. Trans Sports Med. 2024;2024(1) doi: 10.1155/2024/6326566. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stojanović E., Stojiljković N., Scanlan A.T., Dalbo V.J., Berkelmans D.M., Milanović Z. The activity demands and physiological responses encountered during basketball match-play: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(1):111–135. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0794-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yarrow K., Brown P., Krakauer J.W. Inside the brain of an elite athlete: the neural processes that support high achievement in sports. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(8):585–596. doi: 10.1038/nrn2672. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources