Validation of prognostic models in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a real-world nationwide population-based study - development of a clinical nomogram
- PMID: 39738862
- DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-06155-3
Validation of prognostic models in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a real-world nationwide population-based study - development of a clinical nomogram
Abstract
The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is the most frequently used tool for prognostication in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of all ages. This study validated and compared six models developed for patients above 60 with International Prognostic Indices (IPI, R-IPI, NCCN-IPI). Moreover, we created a clinical nomogram with an online tool for individualized predictions. A total of 2,835 patients aged over 60 with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with potentially curative immunochemotherapy were identified in the Danish Lymphoma Registry. A nomogram was developed by combining NCCN-IPI variables (excluding extranodal localization), albumin, and platelet levels in 1,970 patients and verified the results in the remaining 956 patients. Compared to other models, the elderly IPI (E-IPI) and age-adjusted IPI (aaIPI) showed better accuracy and discriminatory ability. However, the models failed to identify a high-risk group with a 3-year overall survival rate below 40%. Our nomogram-based model demonstrated superior discriminatory ability and provided more precise individual predictions than all other models based on a risk stratification system. Most clinical prognostic models fail to accurately predict patient outcomes in patients over 60 years old. Therefore, nomogram-based models should be considered in this population to prevent information loss due to variable dichotomization.
Keywords: Elderly; Nomogram; Prognostic models; To index the content: diffuse large B cell lymphoma; Validation.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: JJ has received travel support from AstraZeneca and Roche. PB has served on advisory boards for Roche, Abbvie, and SERB. TSL has served on advisory boards/consultancy for Roche, Novartis, Gilead, and BMS. TSL received a research Grant from Genentech and travel support from Roche. Other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethical approval and consent to participate: This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Advisory Board for Clinical Quality Development Program (RKKP) (project number 21/27006) has granted approval for conducting this registry-based study, ensuring total anonymity of patients. Further details can be found in the Declaration on passing personal data covered by § 10, a subsection of the Data Protection Act, 1 and 2’, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2019/1509 . Therefore, informed consent from patients was not obtained.
References
-
- Sehn LH, Salles G (2021) Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 384:842–858
-
- Gang AO, Pedersen M, d’Amore F et al (2015) A clinically based prognostic index for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a cut-off at 70 years of age significantly improves prognostic stratification: population-based analysis from the Danish Lymphoma Registry. Leuk Lymphoma 56:2556–2562 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources