Skin substitutes: from conventional to 3D bioprinting
- PMID: 39739216
- DOI: 10.1007/s10047-024-01481-9
Skin substitutes: from conventional to 3D bioprinting
Abstract
Three-dimensional bioprinting is getting enormous attention among the scientific community for its application in complex regenerative tissue engineering applications. One of the focus areas of 3-D bioprinting is Skin tissue engineering. Skin is the largest external organ and also the outer protective layer is prone to injuries due to accidents, burns, pathologic diseases like diabetes, and immobilization of patients due to other health conditions, etc. The demand for skin tissue and the need for an off-the-shelf skin construct to treat patients is increasing on an alarming basis. Conventional approaches like skin grafting increase morbidity. Other approaches include acellular grafts, where integration with the host tissue is a major concern. The emerging technology of the future is 3D bioprinting, where different biopolymers or hybrid polymers together provide the properties of extracellular matrix (ECM) and tissue microenvironment needed for cellular growth and proliferation. This raises the hope for the possibility of a shelf skin construct, which can be used on demand or even skin can be printed directly on the wound site (in-situ printing) based on the depth and complex structure of the wound site. In the present review article, we have tried to provide an overview of Skin tissue engineering, Conventional advancement in technology, 3D bioprinting and bioprinters for skin 3D printing, different biomaterials for skin 3D bioprinting applications, desirable properties of biomaterials and future challenges.
Keywords: Biomaterials; Bioprinters; Skin 3D bioprinting.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
A Review of 3-Dimensional Skin Bioprinting Techniques: Applications, Approaches, and Trends.Dermatol Surg. 2020 Dec;46(12):1500-1505. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002378. Dermatol Surg. 2020. PMID: 32205755
-
Progress in bioprinting technology for tissue regeneration.J Artif Organs. 2023 Dec;26(4):255-274. doi: 10.1007/s10047-023-01394-z. Epub 2023 Apr 29. J Artif Organs. 2023. PMID: 37119315 Review.
-
A review of biomacromolecule-based 3D bioprinting strategies for structure-function integrated repair of skin tissues.Int J Biol Macromol. 2024 May;268(Pt 2):131623. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.131623. Epub 2024 Apr 19. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024. PMID: 38642687 Review.
-
Recent Advances in the Design of Three-Dimensional and Bioprinted Scaffolds for Full-Thickness Wound Healing.Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2022 Feb;28(1):160-181. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2020.0339. Epub 2021 Feb 22. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2022. PMID: 33446047 Review.
-
Recent Trends in Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioinks for 3D Printing: An Updated Review.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 18;20(18):4628. doi: 10.3390/ijms20184628. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31540457 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in regenerative medicine-based approaches for skin regeneration and rejuvenation.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Feb 12;13:1527854. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1527854. eCollection 2025. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025. PMID: 40013305 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Elias PM. Structure and function of the stratum corneum extracellular matrix. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:2131–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2012.246 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Shpichka A, Butnaru D, Bezrukov EA, Sukhanov RB, Atala A, Burdukovskii V, Zhang Y, Timashev P. Skin tissue regeneration for burn injury. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-019-1203-3 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cerqueira MT, Pirraco RP, Marques AP. Stem cells in skin wound healing: are we there yet? Adv Wound Care. 2016;5:164–75. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2014.0607 . - DOI
-
- Pozzi A, Yurchenco PD, Iozzo RV. The nature and biology of basement membranes. Matrix Biol. 2017;57–58:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2016.12.009 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Arda O, Göksügür N, Tüzün Y. Basic histological structure and functions of facial skin. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2013.05.021 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources