Validation of a hand-held ultrasound device in the evaluation of aortic stenosis
- PMID: 39739253
- DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03320-7
Validation of a hand-held ultrasound device in the evaluation of aortic stenosis
Abstract
Hand-held ultrasound devices (HHUD) are increasingly used in routine clinical practice, though they lacked continuous (CW) Doppler capability until recent times. There is limited evidence on the utility of HHUD in assessing aortic stenosis (AS) in real-world settings. Our goal was to validate a new HHUD with CW Doppler assessing AS hemodynamic severity. An observational, single-center study at the Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain between October 2022 and August 2023 was conducted. Patients previously diagnosed with AS were consecutively recruited. Following a reference echocardiographic examination in the cardiac imaging laboratory by an experienced operator (American Society of Echocardiography, level III), a HHUD with CW Doppler (Kosmos, EchoNous™) was used by an operator with intermediate echocardiography experience (American Society of Echocardiography, level II). The focus was on measuring aortic transvalvular Doppler velocities. Agreement between the mean trans-aortic gradient (mAG) was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) test. A total of 101 patients were included. The reference test obtained a mAG of 29 mmHg [19.8-42.2], while the HHUD test showed 27.2 mmHg [16.2-43.9]. A strong correlation was observed (r = 0.89), with an ICC value of 0.87 and no significant bias (1.61 ± 0.9). The HHUD demonstrated very good ability to identify severe AS (kappa = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.94; global agreement 92.1%) and good agreement for moderate (kappa = 0.58; global agreement = 80.2%) and mild (kappa = 0.73; global agreement = 88.1%) AS. Agreement was lower in patients with obesity (ICC = 0.63), poor acoustic windows (ICC = 0.74), or atrial fibrillation (ICC = 0.74). The HHUD showed good agreement with standard echocardiography in assessing AS. While it slightly underestimated mAG, it was accurate enough to reliably quantify AS severity.
Central figure Graphical abstract summarizing the design and results of the study. Upper figure showing a caption of continuous wave doppler corresponds to the hand-held device. Lower figure corresponds to the reference echocardiography device. The upper right figure corresponds to scatter graph showing the correlation between the mean aortic gradient and lower right figure corresponds to Bland-Altman agreement graph.
Keywords: Aortic stenosis; Echocardiography; Hand-held ultrasound; Point of care ultrasound.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Implementing a Continuous Quality Improvement Program in a High-Volume Clinical Echocardiography Laboratory: Improving Care for Patients With Aortic Stenosis.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar;9(3):e003708. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003708. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 26957220
-
Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):604-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.971218. Epub 2012 Jul 13. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012. PMID: 22798520
-
A Novel Handheld Echocardiography Device with Continuous-Wave Doppler Capability: Implications for the Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis Severity.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022 Dec;35(12):1273-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Sep 2. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022. PMID: 36058491
-
Take home messages with cases from focused update on echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis.Heart. 2018 Aug;104(16):1317-1322. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312917. Epub 2018 Mar 23. Heart. 2018. PMID: 29572249 Review.
-
Cardiac Imaging for Assessing Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):185-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.002. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28183438 Review.
References
-
- Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, Kleiman NS, Søndergaard L, Mumtaz M et al (2017) https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700456 . Massachusetts Medical Society; 2017 [cited 2021 Dec 25]. Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. Available from: https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1700456
-
- Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J et al (2022) 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 43(7):561–632 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials