Real-World Evidence of the Prevalence of Driver Mutations in Anorectal Melanoma
- PMID: 39739287
- DOI: 10.1007/s40291-024-00764-4
Real-World Evidence of the Prevalence of Driver Mutations in Anorectal Melanoma
Abstract
Introduction: Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with an aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Recently, recurrent gene mutations related to anorectal melanoma have been identified in a small series of cases, and this holds promise for targeted therapies, analogous to cutaneous melanoma. The purpose of this study was to analyze testing rates and prevalence of mutations in anorectal melanoma in the Dutch population.
Methods: The Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank were queried for all patients with a diagnosis of anorectal melanoma (2009-2019) and for whom a molecular analysis was performed. The genes that were tested and mutations that were reported were recorded. Mutation status was correlated with clinical characteristics.
Results: In the period 2009-2019, 121 patients were diagnosed with anorectal melanoma. A molecular analysis was performed for 81 (67%) using single gene testing and various next-generation sequencing panels. Testing rates increased from 53% in 2009-2012 to 73% in 2016-2019. In 29/81 (36%) analyzed tumors, one or more mutations were reported: mutations in KIT (16/70, 23%), CTNNB1 (3/20, 15%), NRAS (6/60, 10%), BRAF non-V600E (4/74, 5%), GNAS (1/19, 5%), KRAS (1/28, 4%), BRAF V600E (1/74, 1%), and SF3B1 (1/1). In this cohort, a positive correlation was found between BRAF mutation status and age. Mutation status did not correlate with sex, date of diagnosis, tumor stage or surgical treatment. Survival was not influenced by any mutation status.
Conclusion: KIT was the most frequently mutated gene in the 81 analyzed anorectal melanomas in the period 2009-2019. With the increasing testing rates and use of next generation sequencing, the molecular landscape of anorectal melanomas is gradually being revealed. Adoption of broad mutation analysis will reveal potentially actionable targets for treatment of patients with anorectal melanoma.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Funding: Esther Jutten received a grant from the Anna Dorothea Hingst Stichting and the Groningen Melanoma Sarcoma Foundation. (Both did not have any role in study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; nor decision to submit the article for publication.) Conflicts of interest: The authors E. Jutten, L.C.L.T van Kempen, G.F.H. Diercks, B.L. van Leeuwen, S. Kruijff, and K.P. Wevers have no conflicts to report. Availability of data and material: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data. Ethics approval: The ethical committee of the NCR and the privacy and scientific committee of Palga approved this research (K19.108 and K19.290). The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Code availability: Not applicable. Author contributions: E. Jutten: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, writing—original draft. L.C.L.T van Kempen: formal analysis, methodology, supervision, validation, writing—review and editing. G.F.H. Diercks: conceptualization, data curation, supervision, writing—review and editing. B.L. van Leeuwen: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing. S. Kruijff: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing. K.P. Wevers: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, validation, writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final version.
Similar articles
-
Identification of recurrent mutational events in anorectal melanoma.Mod Pathol. 2017 Feb;30(2):286-296. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.179. Epub 2016 Oct 14. Mod Pathol. 2017. PMID: 27739435
-
Recurrent KRAS, KIT and SF3B1 mutations in melanoma of the female genital tract.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jun 8;21(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08427-x. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34102999 Free PMC article.
-
Spectrum and Frequency of BRAF Mutations in Skin Melanomas in the Dalmatian Region of Croatia.Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2024 Mar;32(1):75-76. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2024. PMID: 38946192
-
Anorectal Melanoma - a Histopathological Case Report and a Review of the Literature.Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2018 Dec 1;60(4):641-646. doi: 10.2478/folmed-2018-0040. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2018. PMID: 31188769 Review.
-
BRAF and NRAS mutations are uncommon in melanomas arising in diverse internal organs.J Clin Pathol. 2005 Jun;58(6):640-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.022509. J Clin Pathol. 2005. PMID: 15917418 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- E Jutten, S Kruijff, AB Francken, MF Lutke Holzik, BL van Leeuwen, HL van Westreenen, et al. Surgical treatment of anorectal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BJS open. 5 (2021).
-
- Smith HG, Glen J, Turnbull N, Peach H, Board R, Payne M, et al. Less is more: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of radical versus conservative primary resection in anorectal melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 1990;135(2020):113–20.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous