Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers
- PMID: 39739867
- PMCID: PMC11687790
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316439
Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the ocular biometry agreement and prediction of postoperative refractive outcomes obtained using two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers: Anterion (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and Argos (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA).
Methods: Ambispective analysis was conducted on 105 eyes at the Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea, between June 2021 and March 2022. Biometric values were assessed using both devices before cataract surgery. Intraocular lens (IOL) power, mean arithmetic error (ME), and mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated using the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Hoffer Q formulas.
Results: Anterion showed statistically significantly greater axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), and lens thickness (LT) than Argos (p = 0.03, p < 0.001, and p = 0.032, respectively). There were no significant differences in measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) (p > 0.05). Anterion showed flatter corneal curvature measurements than Argos (p < 0.001). The postoperative prediction errors differed for all three formulas (p < 0.001). Anterion results leaned towards a slightly myopic outcome due to hyperopic target refraction. In all three formulas, the MAE and percentage of eyes with a prediction error ≤ ± 0.5 D were not significantly different between the two devices.
Conclusion: Although the differences are not clinically significant, the measurements of AL, CCT, and LT obtained with Anterion were greater compared to those measured with Argos, while the keratometry (K) and corneal diameter (CD) values were smaller. Consequently, this resulted in a minor difference in refractive predictability, with Anterion showing a slight tendency toward more myopic refractive errors. However, there were no significant differences in MAE or the percentage of eyes within ± 0.5D.
Copyright: © 2024 Park et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Refractive prediction of four different intraocular lens calculation formulas compared between new swept source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry.PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0251152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251152. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33945581 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of refractive outcomes obtained with two swept-source OCT-based optical biometers after cataract surgery: A study of 152 eyes.J Fr Ophtalmol. 2024 Jun;47(6):104186. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2024.104186. Epub 2024 Apr 24. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2024. PMID: 38663226
-
Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using a swept-source optical biometer.PLoS One. 2020 Jan 14;15(1):e0227638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227638. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 31935241 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long eyes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;46(7):738-749. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13184. Epub 2018 Mar 24. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 29498180
-
Clinically relevant biometry.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;23(1):47-53. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834cd63e. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22081032 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Asam JS, Polzer M, Tafreshi A, Hirnschall N, Findl O. Anterior Segment OCT. In: Bille JF, editor. High Resolution Imaging in Microscopy and Ophthalmology: New Frontiers in Biomedical Optics. Cham (CH): Springer Copyright 2019, The Author(s). 2019. pp. 285–99. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources