Randomized double-blind study on safety and tolerability of TP-102 phage cocktail in patients with infected and non-infected diabetic foot ulcers
- PMID: 39740667
- DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.11.018
Randomized double-blind study on safety and tolerability of TP-102 phage cocktail in patients with infected and non-infected diabetic foot ulcers
Abstract
Background: Phage therapy offers a promising alternative for treating serious infections, including diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), through the lytic action of phages. This randomized double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the TP-102 bacteriophage cocktail in patients with DFUs non-infected and infected with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and/or Acinetobacter baumannii.
Methods: Nineteen participants with DFUs were randomized after susceptibility testing. TP-102 was applied topically at 10⁹ plaque-forming units (PFUs)/mL/cm³ to the target ulcer: 1 week for non-infected DFUs and 28 days for infected DFUs (PEDIS grade 2/3). The study was conducted in Israel.
Findings: Main outcomes included the incidence and severity of TP-102-related adverse events, microbiological data, and ulcer healing. Thirteen patients received TP-102. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. Although the study was underpowered to determine the superiority of TP-102 over placebo, a greater proportion of patients in the TP-102 + standard of care (SOC) group showed microbiological reduction of target bacteria (t = 26) compared to the placebo + SOC group (80% versus 50%, p = 1.000). Additionally, a higher proportion of TP-102 patients reached 50% and 75% wound closure compared to placebo (5/7 [71.4%] versus 1/3 [33.3%], p = 0.500 and 2/7 [28.6%] versus none, p = 1.000, respectively). One patient in the TP-102 group achieved wound closure.
Conclusions: TP-102 was well tolerated and safe, showing potential as a groundbreaking treatment in this field. Further studies are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy in larger populations with diabetic foot infections (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04803708).
Funding: None to declare.
Keywords: Translation to patients; bacteriophage; clinical trial; diabetes; diabetic foot ulcers; infection; phage.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests R.N.-P. has been a scientific consultant for BiomX and has participated in and served as a PI and on data safety monitoring boards for a clinical trial by Technophage. R.B.-A. has actively contributed to clinical boards with GlaxoSmithKline and Merck Sharp and has also been involved in lecturing events associated with Teva and Gilead Sciences. S.C.-R. and C.L. participated in a clinical trial by Technophage as cohort escalation committee and safety review committee members, respectively; they are inventors in Technophage’s patents. M.G. is a board member of Technophage S.A., Vector B2B, and LxBio Pharmaceuticals S.A.
Similar articles
-
Topical antimicrobial agents for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 14;6(6):CD011038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011038.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28613416 Free PMC article.
-
Phototherapy for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 28;6(6):CD011979. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011979.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28657134 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of phage therapy in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs): a systematic review.BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):819. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11258-x. BMC Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40596887 Free PMC article.
-
Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 25;4(4):CD004197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004197.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 2;6:CD004197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004197.pub6. PMID: 28440853 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Anabolic steroids for treating pressure ulcers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 20;6(6):CD011375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011375.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28631809 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Bacteria-phage infection network structure and genomic defence system content predict efficacy of a phage therapy cocktail against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from chronic lung infections.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Sep 4;380(1934):20240080. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0080. Epub 2025 Sep 4. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40904112 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the overall development trends and hotspots in the research field of the human gut virome.Virol J. 2025 Jul 5;22(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12985-025-02856-x. Virol J. 2025. PMID: 40618116 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dosing and Delivery of Bacteriophage Therapy In a Murine Wound Infection Model.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Apr 9:2024.05.07.593005. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.07.593005. bioRxiv. 2025. PMID: 38766200 Free PMC article. Preprint.
-
Current Clinical Laboratory Challenges to Widespread Adoption of Phage Therapy in the United States.Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 May 29;14(6):553. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14060553. Antibiotics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40558145 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Phage therapy: a promising approach for Staphylococcus aureus diabetic foot infections.J Virol. 2025 Jun 17;99(6):e0045825. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00458-25. Epub 2025 May 14. J Virol. 2025. PMID: 40366171 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical