Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 31;14(12):e093177.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093177.

Management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials

Affiliations

Management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials

Xiaoyun Wang et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: While multiple studies have shown the safety and efficacy of non-operative management, appendectomy remains the standard treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis (UAA). This study presents a protocol for a meta-analysis comparing antibiotic therapy, endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) and appendectomy in patients with UAA.

Methods and analysis: We will conduct a systematic search of several databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure and the Cochrane Library. The search will cover the full range of database records up to September 2024. Eligible studies will include randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of antibiotic therapy, ERAT and appendectomy for UAA. The primary outcome will be treatment success, while secondary outcomes will include major complications, hospital costs, length of stay and recurrence of appendicitis. Two independent reviewers will select studies, extract data and assess bias risk. A Bayesian approach will be used for the network meta-analysis.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required as the study will use data from published RCTs. The findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024554427.

Keywords: Adult gastroenterology; Gastrointestinal infections; Network Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Selection of studies for inclusion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386:1278–87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00275-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Almeida Leite RM, Seo DJ, Gomez-Eslava B, et al. Nonoperative vs Operative Management of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2022;157:828–34. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2937. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Di Saverio S, Podda M, De Simone B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moris D, Paulson EK, Pappas TN. Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Review. JAMA. 2021;326:2299–311. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20502. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang B, Kong L, Ullah S, et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Endoscopy. 2022;54:747–54. doi: 10.1055/a-1737-6381. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources