Humanising processes after harm part 2: compounded harm experienced by patients and their families after safety incidents
- PMID: 39742113
- PMCID: PMC11685113
- DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1473296
Humanising processes after harm part 2: compounded harm experienced by patients and their families after safety incidents
Abstract
Background: Healthcare organisations risk harming patients and their families twofold. First, through the physical, emotional and/or financial harm caused by safety incidents themselves, and second, through the organisational response to incidents. The former is well-researched and targeted by interventions. However, the latter, termed 'compounded harm' is rarely acknowledged.
Aims: We aimed to explore the ways compounded harm is experienced by patients and their families as a result of organisational responses to safety incidents and propose how this may be reduced in practice.
Methods: We used framework analysis to qualitatively explore data derived from interviews with 42 people with lived or professional experience of safety incident responses. This comprised 18 patients/relatives, 16 investigators, seven healthcare staff and one legal staff. People with lived and professional experience also helped to shape the design, conduct and findings of this study.
Findings: We identified six ways that patients and their families experienced compounded harm because of incident responses. These were feeling: (1) powerless, (2) inconsequential, (3) manipulated, (4) abandoned, (5) de-humanised and (6) disoriented.
Discussion: It is imperative to reduce compounded harm experienced by patients and families. We propose three recommendations for policy and practice: (1) the healthcare system to recognise and address epistemic injustice and equitably support people to be equal partners throughout investigations and subsequent learning to reduce the likelihood of patients and families feeling powerless and inconsequential; (2) honest and transparent regulatory and organisational cultures to be fostered and enacted to reduce the likelihood of patients and families feeling manipulated; and (3) the healthcare system to reorient towards providing restorative responses to harm which are human centred, relational and underpinned by dignity, safety and voluntariness to reduce the likelihood of patients and families feeling abandoned, de-humanised and disoriented.
Keywords: compounded harm; healthcare harm; healthcare litigation; patient involvement; patient safety; qualitative research; safety investigations.
© 2024 Ramsey, Hughes, Hazeldine, Seddon, Gould, Wailling, Murray, McHugh, Simms-Ellis, Halligan, Ludwin and O'Hara.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Wears R, Sutcliffe K. Still Not Safe: Patient Safety and the Middle-Managing of American Medicine. Oxford University Press; (2019).
-
- Edwards HB, Redaniel MT, Opmeer BC, Peters TJ, Margelyte R, Sillero RC, et al. Evaluating the impact of an enhanced support implementation of the PReCePT (PRevention of Cerebral palsy in Pre-Term labour) quality improvement toolkit to increase the uptake of magnesium sulphate in pre-term deliveries for the prevention of neurodisabilities: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. medRxiv. (2020). 2020–09.
-
- Lawton R, Murray J, Baxter R, Richardson G, Cockayne S, Baird K, et al. Evaluating an intervention to improve the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home for older people (your care needs you): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation. Trials. (2023) 24(1):671. 10.1186/s13063-023-07716-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- NHS England. The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework and supporting guidance. Available online at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/patient-safety-incident-response-... (accessed February 01, 2024)
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
