Examining the influence of digital phantom models in virtual imaging trials for tomographic breast imaging
- PMID: 39744152
- PMCID: PMC11686409
- DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.015501
Examining the influence of digital phantom models in virtual imaging trials for tomographic breast imaging
Abstract
Purpose: Digital phantoms are one of the key components of virtual imaging trials (VITs) that aim to assess and optimize new medical imaging systems and algorithms. However, these phantoms vary in their voxel resolution, appearance, and structural details. We investigate whether and how variations between digital phantoms influence system optimization with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) as a chosen modality.
Methods: We selected widely used and open-access digital breast phantoms created with different methods and generated an ensemble of DBT images to test acquisition strategies. Human observer performance was evaluated using localization receiver operating characteristic (LROC) studies for each phantom type. Noise power spectrum and gaze metrics were also employed to compare phantoms and generated images.
Results: Our LROC results show that the arc samplings for peak performance were and 6 deg in Bakic and XCAT breast phantoms, respectively, for the 3-mm lesion detection task and indicate that system optimization outcomes from VITs can vary with phantom types and structural frequency components. In addition, a significant correlation ( ) between gaze metrics and diagnostic performance suggests that gaze analysis can be used to understand and evaluate task difficulty in VITs.
Conclusion: Our results point to the critical need to evaluate realism in digital phantoms and ensure sufficient structural variations at spatial frequencies relevant to the intended task. Standardizing phantom generation and validation tools may help reduce discrepancies among independently conducted VITs for system or algorithmic optimizations.
Keywords: digital breast tomosynthesis; digital phantom; gaze metrics; localization receiver operating characteristic; optimization; structure variability; tomosynthesis; virtual imaging trial; virtual imaging trials; virtual phantom.
© 2024 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).
Update of
-
Examining the Influence of Digital Phantom Models in Virtual Imaging Trials for Tomographic Breast Imaging.ArXiv [Preprint]. 2024 Feb 1:arXiv:2402.00812v1. ArXiv. 2024. Update in: J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(1):015501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.015501. PMID: 38351932 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
Similar articles
-
Examining the Influence of Digital Phantom Models in Virtual Imaging Trials for Tomographic Breast Imaging.ArXiv [Preprint]. 2024 Feb 1:arXiv:2402.00812v1. ArXiv. 2024. Update in: J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(1):015501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.1.015501. PMID: 38351932 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Automated assessment of task-based performance of digital mammography and tomosynthesis systems using an anthropomorphic breast phantom and deep learning-based scoring.J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025 Jan;12(Suppl 1):S13005. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.12.S1.S13005. Epub 2024 Oct 15. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2025. PMID: 39416764
-
A multiple x-ray-source array (MXA) system with a planar two-dimensional source distribution for digital breast tomosynthesis.Med Phys. 2024 Dec;51(12):8709-8724. doi: 10.1002/mp.17452. Epub 2024 Oct 9. Med Phys. 2024. PMID: 39382847 Free PMC article.
-
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29372930 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16959170
References
-
- Bakic P., et al. , “Virtual tools for validation of X-ray breast imaging systems,” Med. Phys. 40(6Part23), 390–390 (2013).MPHYA610.1118/1.4815218 - DOI
-
- Badano A., et al. , “In silico imaging clinical trials for regulatory evaluation: initial considerations for VICTRE, a demonstration study,” Proc. SPIE 10132, 1013220 (2017).PSISDG10.1117/12.2255746 - DOI
-
- Das M., Gifford H. C., “Comparison of model-observer and human-observer performance for breast tomosynthesis: effect of reconstruction and acquisition parameters,” Proc. SPIE 7961, 796118 (2011).PSISDG10.1117/12.878826 - DOI
-
- Das M., Liang Z., Gifford H. C., “Examining wide-arc digital breast tomosynthesis: optimization using a visual-search model observer,” Proc. SPIE 9412, 94121S (2015).PSISDG10.1117/12.2082986 - DOI
-
- Barufaldi B., et al. , “OpenVCT: a GPU-accelerated virtual clinical trial pipeline for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis,” Proc. SPIE 10573, 1057358 (2018).PSISDG10.1117/12.2294935 - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources